2006-10-31 Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com> Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com> Ed Schonberg <schonberg@adacore.com> * exp_ch5.ads (Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement): New procedure. * exp_ch5.adb (Expand_N_Loop_Statement): Do validity checks on range (Expand_N_Assignment_Statement): Call Make_Build_In_Place_Call_In_Assignment if the right-hand side is a build-in-place function call. Currently, this can happen only for assignments that come from aggregates. Add -gnatd.l --Use Ada 95 semantics for limited function returns, in order to alleviate the upward compatibility introduced by AI-318. (Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement): Add support for handling the return object as a build-in-place result. (Expand_Non_Function_Return): Implement simple return statements nested within an extended return. (Enable_New_Return_Processing): Turn on the new processing of return statements. (Expand_Non_Function_Return): For a return within an extended return, don't raise Program_Error, because Sem_Ch6 now gives a warning. (Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement): Implement AI-318 (Expand_Simple_Function_Return): Ditto. (Expand_N_If_Statement): Handle new -gnatwt warning (Expand_N_Case_Statement): Handle new -gnatwt warning (Expand_N_Assignment): Handle assignment to the Priority attribute of a protected object. (Expand_N_Assignment_Statement): Implement -gnatVe/E to control validity checking of assignments to elementary record components. (Expand_N_Return_Statement): return Class Wide types on the secondary stack independantly of their controlled status since with HIE runtimes, class wide types are not potentially controlled anymore. * expander.adb (Expand): Add case for new N_Extended_Return_Statement node kind. * exp_ch11.adb (Expand_N_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements): Avoid Expand_Cleanup_Actions in case of N_Extended_Return_Statement, because it expects a block, procedure, or task. The return statement will get turned into a block, and Expand_Cleanup_Actions will happen then. From-SVN: r118258
4835 lines
181 KiB
Ada
4835 lines
181 KiB
Ada
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- E X P _ C H 5 --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- B o d y --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2006, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
|
|
-- to the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, --
|
|
-- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
with Atree; use Atree;
|
|
with Checks; use Checks;
|
|
with Debug; use Debug;
|
|
with Einfo; use Einfo;
|
|
with Elists; use Elists;
|
|
with Exp_Aggr; use Exp_Aggr;
|
|
with Exp_Ch6; use Exp_Ch6;
|
|
with Exp_Ch7; use Exp_Ch7;
|
|
with Exp_Ch11; use Exp_Ch11;
|
|
with Exp_Dbug; use Exp_Dbug;
|
|
with Exp_Pakd; use Exp_Pakd;
|
|
with Exp_Tss; use Exp_Tss;
|
|
with Exp_Util; use Exp_Util;
|
|
with Hostparm; use Hostparm;
|
|
with Nlists; use Nlists;
|
|
with Nmake; use Nmake;
|
|
with Opt; use Opt;
|
|
with Restrict; use Restrict;
|
|
with Rident; use Rident;
|
|
with Rtsfind; use Rtsfind;
|
|
with Sinfo; use Sinfo;
|
|
with Sem; use Sem;
|
|
with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3;
|
|
with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
|
|
with Sem_Ch13; use Sem_Ch13;
|
|
with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval;
|
|
with Sem_Res; use Sem_Res;
|
|
with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
|
|
with Snames; use Snames;
|
|
with Stand; use Stand;
|
|
with Stringt; use Stringt;
|
|
with Tbuild; use Tbuild;
|
|
with Ttypes; use Ttypes;
|
|
with Uintp; use Uintp;
|
|
with Validsw; use Validsw;
|
|
|
|
package body Exp_Ch5 is
|
|
|
|
Enable_New_Return_Processing : constant Boolean := True;
|
|
-- ??? This flag is temporary. False causes the compiler to use the old
|
|
-- version of Analyze_Return_Statement; True, the new version, which does
|
|
-- not yet work. We probably want this to match the corresponding thing
|
|
-- in sem_ch6.adb.
|
|
|
|
function Change_Of_Representation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine if the right hand side of the assignment N is a type
|
|
-- conversion which requires a change of representation. Called
|
|
-- only for the array and record cases.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Assign_Array (N : Node_Id; Rhs : Node_Id);
|
|
-- N is an assignment which assigns an array value. This routine process
|
|
-- the various special cases and checks required for such assignments,
|
|
-- including change of representation. Rhs is normally simply the right
|
|
-- hand side of the assignment, except that if the right hand side is
|
|
-- a type conversion or a qualified expression, then the Rhs is the
|
|
-- actual expression inside any such type conversions or qualifications.
|
|
|
|
function Expand_Assign_Array_Loop
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Larray : Entity_Id;
|
|
Rarray : Entity_Id;
|
|
L_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
R_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ndim : Pos;
|
|
Rev : Boolean) return Node_Id;
|
|
-- N is an assignment statement which assigns an array value. This routine
|
|
-- expands the assignment into a loop (or nested loops for the case of a
|
|
-- multi-dimensional array) to do the assignment component by component.
|
|
-- Larray and Rarray are the entities of the actual arrays on the left
|
|
-- hand and right hand sides. L_Type and R_Type are the types of these
|
|
-- arrays (which may not be the same, due to either sliding, or to a
|
|
-- change of representation case). Ndim is the number of dimensions and
|
|
-- the parameter Rev indicates if the loops run normally (Rev = False),
|
|
-- or reversed (Rev = True). The value returned is the constructed
|
|
-- loop statement. Auxiliary declarations are inserted before node N
|
|
-- using the standard Insert_Actions mechanism.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Assign_Record (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- N is an assignment of a non-tagged record value. This routine handles
|
|
-- the case where the assignment must be made component by component,
|
|
-- either because the target is not byte aligned, or there is a change
|
|
-- of representation.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Non_Function_Return (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Called by Expand_Simple_Return in case we're returning from a procedure
|
|
-- body, entry body, accept statement, or extended returns statement.
|
|
-- Note that all non-function returns are simple return statements.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Simple_Function_Return (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Expand simple return from function. Called by Expand_Simple_Return in
|
|
-- case we're returning from a function body.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Simple_Return (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Expansion for simple return statements. Calls either
|
|
-- Expand_Simple_Function_Return or Expand_Non_Function_Return.
|
|
|
|
function Make_Tag_Ctrl_Assignment (N : Node_Id) return List_Id;
|
|
-- Generate the necessary code for controlled and tagged assignment,
|
|
-- that is to say, finalization of the target before, adjustement of
|
|
-- the target after and save and restore of the tag and finalization
|
|
-- pointers which are not 'part of the value' and must not be changed
|
|
-- upon assignment. N is the original Assignment node.
|
|
|
|
procedure No_Secondary_Stack_Case (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Obsolete code to deal with functions for which
|
|
-- Function_Returns_With_DSP is True.
|
|
|
|
function Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- This function is used in processing the assignment of a record or
|
|
-- indexed component. The argument N is either the left hand or right
|
|
-- hand side of an assignment, and this function determines if there
|
|
-- is a record component reference where the record may be bit aligned
|
|
-- in a manner that causes trouble for the back end (see description
|
|
-- of Exp_Util.Component_May_Be_Bit_Aligned for further details).
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Change_Of_Representation --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Change_Of_Representation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Rhs : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
Nkind (Rhs) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
and then
|
|
not Same_Representation (Etype (Rhs), Etype (Expression (Rhs)));
|
|
end Change_Of_Representation;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Assign_Array --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- There are two issues here. First, do we let Gigi do a block move, or
|
|
-- do we expand out into a loop? Second, we need to set the two flags
|
|
-- Forwards_OK and Backwards_OK which show whether the block move (or
|
|
-- corresponding loops) can be legitimately done in a forwards (low to
|
|
-- high) or backwards (high to low) manner.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Assign_Array (N : Node_Id; Rhs : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
|
|
Lhs : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
|
|
Act_Lhs : constant Node_Id := Get_Referenced_Object (Lhs);
|
|
Act_Rhs : Node_Id := Get_Referenced_Object (Rhs);
|
|
|
|
L_Type : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Underlying_Type (Get_Actual_Subtype (Act_Lhs));
|
|
R_Type : Entity_Id :=
|
|
Underlying_Type (Get_Actual_Subtype (Act_Rhs));
|
|
|
|
L_Slice : constant Boolean := Nkind (Act_Lhs) = N_Slice;
|
|
R_Slice : constant Boolean := Nkind (Act_Rhs) = N_Slice;
|
|
|
|
Crep : constant Boolean := Change_Of_Representation (N);
|
|
|
|
Larray : Node_Id;
|
|
Rarray : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Ndim : constant Pos := Number_Dimensions (L_Type);
|
|
|
|
Loop_Required : Boolean := False;
|
|
-- This switch is set to True if the array move must be done using
|
|
-- an explicit front end generated loop.
|
|
|
|
procedure Apply_Dereference (Arg : in out Node_Id);
|
|
-- If the argument is an access to an array, and the assignment is
|
|
-- converted into a procedure call, apply explicit dereference.
|
|
|
|
function Has_Address_Clause (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Test if Exp is a reference to an array whose declaration has
|
|
-- an address clause, or it is a slice of such an array.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Formal_Array (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Test if Exp is a reference to an array which is either a formal
|
|
-- parameter or a slice of a formal parameter. These are the cases
|
|
-- where hidden aliasing can occur.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Non_Local_Array (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine if Exp is a reference to an array variable which is other
|
|
-- than an object defined in the current scope, or a slice of such
|
|
-- an object. Such objects can be aliased to parameters (unlike local
|
|
-- array references).
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Apply_Dereference --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Apply_Dereference (Arg : in out Node_Id) is
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Arg);
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Typ) then
|
|
Rewrite (Arg, Make_Explicit_Dereference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Relocate_Node (Arg)));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Arg, Designated_Type (Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Apply_Dereference;
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Has_Address_Clause --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Has_Address_Clause (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
(Is_Entity_Name (Exp) and then
|
|
Present (Address_Clause (Entity (Exp))))
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nkind (Exp) = N_Slice and then Has_Address_Clause (Prefix (Exp)));
|
|
end Has_Address_Clause;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Is_Formal_Array --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Formal_Array (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
(Is_Entity_Name (Exp) and then Is_Formal (Entity (Exp)))
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nkind (Exp) = N_Slice and then Is_Formal_Array (Prefix (Exp)));
|
|
end Is_Formal_Array;
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Non_Local_Array --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Non_Local_Array (Exp : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return (Is_Entity_Name (Exp)
|
|
and then Scope (Entity (Exp)) /= Current_Scope)
|
|
or else (Nkind (Exp) = N_Slice
|
|
and then Is_Non_Local_Array (Prefix (Exp)));
|
|
end Is_Non_Local_Array;
|
|
|
|
-- Determine if Lhs, Rhs are formal arrays or nonlocal arrays
|
|
|
|
Lhs_Formal : constant Boolean := Is_Formal_Array (Act_Lhs);
|
|
Rhs_Formal : constant Boolean := Is_Formal_Array (Act_Rhs);
|
|
|
|
Lhs_Non_Local_Var : constant Boolean := Is_Non_Local_Array (Act_Lhs);
|
|
Rhs_Non_Local_Var : constant Boolean := Is_Non_Local_Array (Act_Rhs);
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Expand_Assign_Array
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Deal with length check, note that the length check is done with
|
|
-- respect to the right hand side as given, not a possible underlying
|
|
-- renamed object, since this would generate incorrect extra checks.
|
|
|
|
Apply_Length_Check (Rhs, L_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- We start by assuming that the move can be done in either
|
|
-- direction, i.e. that the two sides are completely disjoint.
|
|
|
|
Set_Forwards_OK (N, True);
|
|
Set_Backwards_OK (N, True);
|
|
|
|
-- Normally it is only the slice case that can lead to overlap,
|
|
-- and explicit checks for slices are made below. But there is
|
|
-- one case where the slice can be implicit and invisible to us
|
|
-- and that is the case where we have a one dimensional array,
|
|
-- and either both operands are parameters, or one is a parameter
|
|
-- and the other is a global variable. In this case the parameter
|
|
-- could be a slice that overlaps with the other parameter.
|
|
|
|
-- Check for the case of slices requiring an explicit loop. Normally
|
|
-- it is only the explicit slice cases that bother us, but in the
|
|
-- case of one dimensional arrays, parameters can be slices that
|
|
-- are passed by reference, so we can have aliasing for assignments
|
|
-- from one parameter to another, or assignments between parameters
|
|
-- and nonlocal variables. However, if the array subtype is a
|
|
-- constrained first subtype in the parameter case, then we don't
|
|
-- have to worry about overlap, since slice assignments aren't
|
|
-- possible (other than for a slice denoting the whole array).
|
|
|
|
-- Note: overlap is never possible if there is a change of
|
|
-- representation, so we can exclude this case.
|
|
|
|
if Ndim = 1
|
|
and then not Crep
|
|
and then
|
|
((Lhs_Formal and Rhs_Formal)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Lhs_Formal and Rhs_Non_Local_Var)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Rhs_Formal and Lhs_Non_Local_Var))
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Constrained (Etype (Lhs))
|
|
or else not Is_First_Subtype (Etype (Lhs)))
|
|
|
|
-- In the case of compiling for the Java Virtual Machine,
|
|
-- slices are always passed by making a copy, so we don't
|
|
-- have to worry about overlap. We also want to prevent
|
|
-- generation of "<" comparisons for array addresses,
|
|
-- since that's a meaningless operation on the JVM.
|
|
|
|
and then not Java_VM
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Forwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
Set_Backwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
|
|
-- Note: the bit-packed case is not worrisome here, since if
|
|
-- we have a slice passed as a parameter, it is always aligned
|
|
-- on a byte boundary, and if there are no explicit slices, the
|
|
-- assignment can be performed directly.
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- We certainly must use a loop for change of representation
|
|
-- and also we use the operand of the conversion on the right
|
|
-- hand side as the effective right hand side (the component
|
|
-- types must match in this situation).
|
|
|
|
if Crep then
|
|
Act_Rhs := Get_Referenced_Object (Rhs);
|
|
R_Type := Get_Actual_Subtype (Act_Rhs);
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- We require a loop if the left side is possibly bit unaligned
|
|
|
|
elsif Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (Lhs)
|
|
or else
|
|
Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Arrays with controlled components are expanded into a loop
|
|
-- to force calls to adjust at the component level.
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Controlled_Component (L_Type) then
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- If object is atomic, we cannot tolerate a loop
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Atomic_Object (Act_Lhs)
|
|
or else
|
|
Is_Atomic_Object (Act_Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Loop is required if we have atomic components since we have to
|
|
-- be sure to do any accesses on an element by element basis.
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Atomic_Components (L_Type)
|
|
or else Has_Atomic_Components (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Atomic (Component_Type (L_Type))
|
|
or else Is_Atomic (Component_Type (R_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where no slice is involved
|
|
|
|
elsif not L_Slice and not R_Slice then
|
|
|
|
-- The following code deals with the case of unconstrained bit
|
|
-- packed arrays. The problem is that the template for such
|
|
-- arrays contains the bounds of the actual source level array,
|
|
|
|
-- But the copy of an entire array requires the bounds of the
|
|
-- underlying array. It would be nice if the back end could take
|
|
-- care of this, but right now it does not know how, so if we
|
|
-- have such a type, then we expand out into a loop, which is
|
|
-- inefficient but works correctly. If we don't do this, we
|
|
-- get the wrong length computed for the array to be moved.
|
|
-- The two cases we need to worry about are:
|
|
|
|
-- Explicit deference of an unconstrained packed array type as
|
|
-- in the following example:
|
|
|
|
-- procedure C52 is
|
|
-- type BITS is array(INTEGER range <>) of BOOLEAN;
|
|
-- pragma PACK(BITS);
|
|
-- type A is access BITS;
|
|
-- P1,P2 : A;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- P1 := new BITS (1 .. 65_535);
|
|
-- P2 := new BITS (1 .. 65_535);
|
|
-- P2.ALL := P1.ALL;
|
|
-- end C52;
|
|
|
|
-- A formal parameter reference with an unconstrained bit
|
|
-- array type is the other case we need to worry about (here
|
|
-- we assume the same BITS type declared above):
|
|
|
|
-- procedure Write_All (File : out BITS; Contents : BITS);
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- File.Storage := Contents;
|
|
-- end Write_All;
|
|
|
|
-- We expand to a loop in either of these two cases
|
|
|
|
-- Question for future thought. Another potentially more efficient
|
|
-- approach would be to create the actual subtype, and then do an
|
|
-- unchecked conversion to this actual subtype ???
|
|
|
|
Check_Unconstrained_Bit_Packed_Array : declare
|
|
|
|
function Is_UBPA_Reference (Opnd : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Function to perform required test for the first case,
|
|
-- above (dereference of an unconstrained bit packed array)
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Is_UBPA_Reference --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_UBPA_Reference (Opnd : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Etype (Opnd));
|
|
P_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Des_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Packed_Array_Type (Typ))
|
|
and then Is_Array_Type (Packed_Array_Type (Typ))
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Packed_Array_Type (Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Opnd) = N_Explicit_Dereference then
|
|
P_Type := Underlying_Type (Etype (Prefix (Opnd)));
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Access_Type (P_Type) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Des_Type := Designated_Type (P_Type);
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Bit_Packed_Array (Des_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Des_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_UBPA_Reference;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Unconstrained_Bit_Packed_Array
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_UBPA_Reference (Lhs)
|
|
or else
|
|
Is_UBPA_Reference (Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Here if we do not have the case of a reference to a bit
|
|
-- packed unconstrained array case. In this case gigi can
|
|
-- most certainly handle the assignment if a forwards move
|
|
-- is allowed.
|
|
|
|
-- (could it handle the backwards case also???)
|
|
|
|
elsif Forwards_OK (N) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Unconstrained_Bit_Packed_Array;
|
|
|
|
-- The back end can always handle the assignment if the right side is a
|
|
-- string literal (note that overlap is definitely impossible in this
|
|
-- case). If the type is packed, a string literal is always converted
|
|
-- into aggregate, except in the case of a null slice, for which no
|
|
-- aggregate can be written. In that case, rewrite the assignment as a
|
|
-- null statement, a length check has already been emitted to verify
|
|
-- that the range of the left-hand side is empty.
|
|
|
|
-- Note that this code is not executed if we had an assignment of
|
|
-- a string literal to a non-bit aligned component of a record, a
|
|
-- case which cannot be handled by the backend
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Rhs) = N_String_Literal then
|
|
if String_Length (Strval (Rhs)) = 0
|
|
and then Is_Bit_Packed_Array (L_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If either operand is bit packed, then we need a loop, since we
|
|
-- can't be sure that the slice is byte aligned. Similarly, if either
|
|
-- operand is a possibly unaligned slice, then we need a loop (since
|
|
-- the back end cannot handle unaligned slices).
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Bit_Packed_Array (L_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Bit_Packed_Array (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Possibly_Unaligned_Slice (Lhs)
|
|
or else Is_Possibly_Unaligned_Slice (Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
Loop_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- If we are not bit-packed, and we have only one slice, then no
|
|
-- overlap is possible except in the parameter case, so we can let
|
|
-- the back end handle things.
|
|
|
|
elsif not (L_Slice and R_Slice) then
|
|
if Forwards_OK (N) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the right-hand side is a string literal, introduce a temporary
|
|
-- for it, for use in the generated loop that will follow.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Rhs) = N_String_Literal then
|
|
declare
|
|
Temp : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc, New_Internal_Name ('T'));
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Decl :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Temp,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (L_Type, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Rhs));
|
|
|
|
Insert_Action (N, Decl);
|
|
Rewrite (Rhs, New_Occurrence_Of (Temp, Loc));
|
|
R_Type := Etype (Temp);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Come here to complete the analysis
|
|
|
|
-- Loop_Required: Set to True if we know that a loop is required
|
|
-- regardless of overlap considerations.
|
|
|
|
-- Forwards_OK: Set to False if we already know that a forwards
|
|
-- move is not safe, else set to True.
|
|
|
|
-- Backwards_OK: Set to False if we already know that a backwards
|
|
-- move is not safe, else set to True
|
|
|
|
-- Our task at this stage is to complete the overlap analysis, which
|
|
-- can result in possibly setting Forwards_OK or Backwards_OK to
|
|
-- False, and then generating the final code, either by deciding
|
|
-- that it is OK after all to let Gigi handle it, or by generating
|
|
-- appropriate code in the front end.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
L_Index_Typ : constant Node_Id := Etype (First_Index (L_Type));
|
|
R_Index_Typ : constant Node_Id := Etype (First_Index (R_Type));
|
|
|
|
Left_Lo : constant Node_Id := Type_Low_Bound (L_Index_Typ);
|
|
Left_Hi : constant Node_Id := Type_High_Bound (L_Index_Typ);
|
|
Right_Lo : constant Node_Id := Type_Low_Bound (R_Index_Typ);
|
|
Right_Hi : constant Node_Id := Type_High_Bound (R_Index_Typ);
|
|
|
|
Act_L_Array : Node_Id;
|
|
Act_R_Array : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Cleft_Lo : Node_Id;
|
|
Cright_Lo : Node_Id;
|
|
Condition : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Cresult : Compare_Result;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Get the expressions for the arrays. If we are dealing with a
|
|
-- private type, then convert to the underlying type. We can do
|
|
-- direct assignments to an array that is a private type, but
|
|
-- we cannot assign to elements of the array without this extra
|
|
-- unchecked conversion.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Act_Lhs) = N_Slice then
|
|
Larray := Prefix (Act_Lhs);
|
|
else
|
|
Larray := Act_Lhs;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Private_Type (Etype (Larray)) then
|
|
Larray :=
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To
|
|
(Underlying_Type (Etype (Larray)), Larray);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Act_Rhs) = N_Slice then
|
|
Rarray := Prefix (Act_Rhs);
|
|
else
|
|
Rarray := Act_Rhs;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Private_Type (Etype (Rarray)) then
|
|
Rarray :=
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To
|
|
(Underlying_Type (Etype (Rarray)), Rarray);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If both sides are slices, we must figure out whether
|
|
-- it is safe to do the move in one direction or the other
|
|
-- It is always safe if there is a change of representation
|
|
-- since obviously two arrays with different representations
|
|
-- cannot possibly overlap.
|
|
|
|
if (not Crep) and L_Slice and R_Slice then
|
|
Act_L_Array := Get_Referenced_Object (Prefix (Act_Lhs));
|
|
Act_R_Array := Get_Referenced_Object (Prefix (Act_Rhs));
|
|
|
|
-- If both left and right hand arrays are entity names, and
|
|
-- refer to different entities, then we know that the move
|
|
-- is safe (the two storage areas are completely disjoint).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Entity_Name (Act_L_Array)
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (Act_R_Array)
|
|
and then Entity (Act_L_Array) /= Entity (Act_R_Array)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise, we assume the worst, which is that the two
|
|
-- arrays are the same array. There is no need to check if
|
|
-- we know that is the case, because if we don't know it,
|
|
-- we still have to assume it!
|
|
|
|
-- Generally if the same array is involved, then we have
|
|
-- an overlapping case. We will have to really assume the
|
|
-- worst (i.e. set neither of the OK flags) unless we can
|
|
-- determine the lower or upper bounds at compile time and
|
|
-- compare them.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Cresult := Compile_Time_Compare (Left_Lo, Right_Lo);
|
|
|
|
if Cresult = Unknown then
|
|
Cresult := Compile_Time_Compare (Left_Hi, Right_Hi);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
case Cresult is
|
|
when LT | LE | EQ => Set_Backwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
when GT | GE => Set_Forwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
when NE | Unknown => Set_Backwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
Set_Forwards_OK (N, False);
|
|
end case;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If after that analysis, Forwards_OK is still True, and
|
|
-- Loop_Required is False, meaning that we have not discovered
|
|
-- some non-overlap reason for requiring a loop, then we can
|
|
-- still let gigi handle it.
|
|
|
|
if not Loop_Required then
|
|
if Forwards_OK (N) then
|
|
return;
|
|
else
|
|
null;
|
|
-- Here is where a memmove would be appropriate ???
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- At this stage we have to generate an explicit loop, and
|
|
-- we have the following cases:
|
|
|
|
-- Forwards_OK = True
|
|
|
|
-- Rnn : right_index := right_index'First;
|
|
-- for Lnn in left-index loop
|
|
-- left (Lnn) := right (Rnn);
|
|
-- Rnn := right_index'Succ (Rnn);
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Note: the above code MUST be analyzed with checks off,
|
|
-- because otherwise the Succ could overflow. But in any
|
|
-- case this is more efficient!
|
|
|
|
-- Forwards_OK = False, Backwards_OK = True
|
|
|
|
-- Rnn : right_index := right_index'Last;
|
|
-- for Lnn in reverse left-index loop
|
|
-- left (Lnn) := right (Rnn);
|
|
-- Rnn := right_index'Pred (Rnn);
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Note: the above code MUST be analyzed with checks off,
|
|
-- because otherwise the Pred could overflow. But in any
|
|
-- case this is more efficient!
|
|
|
|
-- Forwards_OK = Backwards_OK = False
|
|
|
|
-- This only happens if we have the same array on each side. It is
|
|
-- possible to create situations using overlays that violate this,
|
|
-- but we simply do not promise to get this "right" in this case.
|
|
|
|
-- There are two possible subcases. If the No_Implicit_Conditionals
|
|
-- restriction is set, then we generate the following code:
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- T : constant <operand-type> := rhs;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- lhs := T;
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- If implicit conditionals are permitted, then we generate:
|
|
|
|
-- if Left_Lo <= Right_Lo then
|
|
-- <code for Forwards_OK = True above>
|
|
-- else
|
|
-- <code for Backwards_OK = True above>
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Cases where either Forwards_OK or Backwards_OK is true
|
|
|
|
if Forwards_OK (N) or else Backwards_OK (N) then
|
|
if Controlled_Type (Component_Type (L_Type))
|
|
and then Base_Type (L_Type) = Base_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then Ndim = 1
|
|
and then not No_Ctrl_Actions (N)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Proc : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
TSS (Base_Type (L_Type), TSS_Slice_Assign);
|
|
Actuals : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Apply_Dereference (Larray);
|
|
Apply_Dereference (Rarray);
|
|
Actuals := New_List (
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Larray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Rarray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Left_Lo, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Left_Hi, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Right_Lo, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Right_Hi, Name_Req => True));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Actuals,
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (
|
|
Boolean_Literals (not Forwards_OK (N)), Loc));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To (Proc, Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => Actuals));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Expand_Assign_Array_Loop
|
|
(N, Larray, Rarray, L_Type, R_Type, Ndim,
|
|
Rev => not Forwards_OK (N)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of both are false with No_Implicit_Conditionals
|
|
|
|
elsif Restriction_Active (No_Implicit_Conditionals) then
|
|
declare
|
|
T : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Name_T);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Declarations => New_List (
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => T,
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Object_Definition =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Etype (Rhs), Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Rhs))),
|
|
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => Relocate_Node (Lhs),
|
|
Expression => New_Occurrence_Of (T, Loc))))));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of both are false with implicit conditionals allowed
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Before we generate this code, we must ensure that the
|
|
-- left and right side array types are defined. They may
|
|
-- be itypes, and we cannot let them be defined inside the
|
|
-- if, since the first use in the then may not be executed.
|
|
|
|
Ensure_Defined (L_Type, N);
|
|
Ensure_Defined (R_Type, N);
|
|
|
|
-- We normally compare addresses to find out which way round
|
|
-- to do the loop, since this is realiable, and handles the
|
|
-- cases of parameters, conversions etc. But we can't do that
|
|
-- in the bit packed case or the Java VM case, because addresses
|
|
-- don't work there.
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Bit_Packed_Array (L_Type) and then not Java_VM then
|
|
Condition :=
|
|
Make_Op_Le (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (RTE (RE_Integer_Address),
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr_Move_Checks (Larray, True),
|
|
Expressions => New_List (
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(L_Index_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_First))),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Address)),
|
|
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (RTE (RE_Integer_Address),
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr_Move_Checks (Rarray, True),
|
|
Expressions => New_List (
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(R_Index_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_First))),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Address)));
|
|
|
|
-- For the bit packed and Java VM cases we use the bounds.
|
|
-- That's OK, because we don't have to worry about parameters,
|
|
-- since they cannot cause overlap. Perhaps we should worry
|
|
-- about weird slice conversions ???
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Copy the bounds and reset the Analyzed flag, because the
|
|
-- bounds of the index type itself may be universal, and must
|
|
-- must be reaanalyzed to acquire the proper type for Gigi.
|
|
|
|
Cleft_Lo := New_Copy_Tree (Left_Lo);
|
|
Cright_Lo := New_Copy_Tree (Right_Lo);
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Cleft_Lo, False);
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Cright_Lo, False);
|
|
|
|
Condition :=
|
|
Make_Op_Le (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd => Cleft_Lo,
|
|
Right_Opnd => Cright_Lo);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Controlled_Type (Component_Type (L_Type))
|
|
and then Base_Type (L_Type) = Base_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then Ndim = 1
|
|
and then not No_Ctrl_Actions (N)
|
|
then
|
|
|
|
-- Call TSS procedure for array assignment, passing the
|
|
-- the explicit bounds of right and left hand sides.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Proc : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
TSS (Base_Type (L_Type), TSS_Slice_Assign);
|
|
Actuals : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Apply_Dereference (Larray);
|
|
Apply_Dereference (Rarray);
|
|
Actuals := New_List (
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Larray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Rarray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Left_Lo, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Left_Hi, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Right_Lo, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Right_Hi, Name_Req => True));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Actuals,
|
|
Make_Op_Not (Loc,
|
|
Right_Opnd => Condition));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To (Proc, Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => Actuals));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Implicit_If_Statement (N,
|
|
Condition => Condition,
|
|
|
|
Then_Statements => New_List (
|
|
Expand_Assign_Array_Loop
|
|
(N, Larray, Rarray, L_Type, R_Type, Ndim,
|
|
Rev => False)),
|
|
|
|
Else_Statements => New_List (
|
|
Expand_Assign_Array_Loop
|
|
(N, Larray, Rarray, L_Type, R_Type, Ndim,
|
|
Rev => True))));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze (N, Suppress => All_Checks);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
exception
|
|
when RE_Not_Available =>
|
|
return;
|
|
end Expand_Assign_Array;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Assign_Array_Loop --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- The following is an example of the loop generated for the case of
|
|
-- a two-dimensional array:
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- R2b : Tm1X1 := 1;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- for L1b in 1 .. 100 loop
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- R4b : Tm1X2 := 1;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- for L3b in 1 .. 100 loop
|
|
-- vm1 (L1b, L3b) := vm2 (R2b, R4b);
|
|
-- R4b := Tm1X2'succ(R4b);
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
-- end;
|
|
-- R2b := Tm1X1'succ(R2b);
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- Here Rev is False, and Tm1Xn are the subscript types for the right
|
|
-- hand side. The declarations of R2b and R4b are inserted before the
|
|
-- original assignment statement.
|
|
|
|
function Expand_Assign_Array_Loop
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Larray : Entity_Id;
|
|
Rarray : Entity_Id;
|
|
L_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
R_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ndim : Pos;
|
|
Rev : Boolean) return Node_Id
|
|
is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
|
|
Lnn : array (1 .. Ndim) of Entity_Id;
|
|
Rnn : array (1 .. Ndim) of Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Entities used as subscripts on left and right sides
|
|
|
|
L_Index_Type : array (1 .. Ndim) of Entity_Id;
|
|
R_Index_Type : array (1 .. Ndim) of Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Left and right index types
|
|
|
|
Assign : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
F_Or_L : Name_Id;
|
|
S_Or_P : Name_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Rev then
|
|
F_Or_L := Name_Last;
|
|
S_Or_P := Name_Pred;
|
|
else
|
|
F_Or_L := Name_First;
|
|
S_Or_P := Name_Succ;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Setup index types and subscript entities
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
L_Index : Node_Id;
|
|
R_Index : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
L_Index := First_Index (L_Type);
|
|
R_Index := First_Index (R_Type);
|
|
|
|
for J in 1 .. Ndim loop
|
|
Lnn (J) :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('L'));
|
|
|
|
Rnn (J) :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
|
|
L_Index_Type (J) := Etype (L_Index);
|
|
R_Index_Type (J) := Etype (R_Index);
|
|
|
|
Next_Index (L_Index);
|
|
Next_Index (R_Index);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Now construct the assignment statement
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
ExprL : constant List_Id := New_List;
|
|
ExprR : constant List_Id := New_List;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
for J in 1 .. Ndim loop
|
|
Append_To (ExprL, New_Occurrence_Of (Lnn (J), Loc));
|
|
Append_To (ExprR, New_Occurrence_Of (Rnn (J), Loc));
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Assign :=
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name =>
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Larray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Expressions => ExprL),
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Rarray, Name_Req => True),
|
|
Expressions => ExprR));
|
|
|
|
-- We set assignment OK, since there are some cases, e.g. in object
|
|
-- declarations, where we are actually assigning into a constant.
|
|
-- If there really is an illegality, it was caught long before now,
|
|
-- and was flagged when the original assignment was analyzed.
|
|
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Name (Assign));
|
|
|
|
-- Propagate the No_Ctrl_Actions flag to individual assignments
|
|
|
|
Set_No_Ctrl_Actions (Assign, No_Ctrl_Actions (N));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Now construct the loop from the inside out, with the last subscript
|
|
-- varying most rapidly. Note that Assign is first the raw assignment
|
|
-- statement, and then subsequently the loop that wraps it up.
|
|
|
|
for J in reverse 1 .. Ndim loop
|
|
Assign :=
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Declarations => New_List (
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Rnn (J),
|
|
Object_Definition =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (R_Index_Type (J), Loc),
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Occurrence_Of (R_Index_Type (J), Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => F_Or_L))),
|
|
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (
|
|
Make_Implicit_Loop_Statement (N,
|
|
Iteration_Scheme =>
|
|
Make_Iteration_Scheme (Loc,
|
|
Loop_Parameter_Specification =>
|
|
Make_Loop_Parameter_Specification (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Lnn (J),
|
|
Reverse_Present => Rev,
|
|
Discrete_Subtype_Definition =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (L_Index_Type (J), Loc))),
|
|
|
|
Statements => New_List (
|
|
Assign,
|
|
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Rnn (J), Loc),
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (R_Index_Type (J), Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => S_Or_P,
|
|
Expressions => New_List (
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Rnn (J), Loc)))))))));
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return Assign;
|
|
end Expand_Assign_Array_Loop;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Assign_Record --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- The only processing required is in the change of representation
|
|
-- case, where we must expand the assignment to a series of field
|
|
-- by field assignments.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Assign_Record (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Lhs : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
Rhs : Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If change of representation, then extract the real right hand
|
|
-- side from the type conversion, and proceed with component-wise
|
|
-- assignment, since the two types are not the same as far as the
|
|
-- back end is concerned.
|
|
|
|
if Change_Of_Representation (N) then
|
|
Rhs := Expression (Rhs);
|
|
|
|
-- If this may be a case of a large bit aligned component, then
|
|
-- proceed with component-wise assignment, to avoid possible
|
|
-- clobbering of other components sharing bits in the first or
|
|
-- last byte of the component to be assigned.
|
|
|
|
elsif Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (Lhs)
|
|
or
|
|
Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- If neither condition met, then nothing special to do, the back end
|
|
-- can handle assignment of the entire component as a single entity.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- At this stage we know that we must do a component wise assignment
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
R_Typ : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Etype (Rhs));
|
|
L_Typ : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Etype (Lhs));
|
|
Decl : constant Node_Id := Declaration_Node (R_Typ);
|
|
RDef : Node_Id;
|
|
F : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Find_Component
|
|
(Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Comp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Find the component with the given name in the underlying record
|
|
-- declaration for Typ. We need to use the actual entity because
|
|
-- the type may be private and resolution by identifier alone would
|
|
-- fail.
|
|
|
|
function Make_Component_List_Assign
|
|
(CL : Node_Id;
|
|
U_U : Boolean := False) return List_Id;
|
|
-- Returns a sequence of statements to assign the components that
|
|
-- are referenced in the given component list. The flag U_U is
|
|
-- used to force the usage of the inferred value of the variant
|
|
-- part expression as the switch for the generated case statement.
|
|
|
|
function Make_Field_Assign
|
|
(C : Entity_Id;
|
|
U_U : Boolean := False) return Node_Id;
|
|
-- Given C, the entity for a discriminant or component, build an
|
|
-- assignment for the corresponding field values. The flag U_U
|
|
-- signals the presence of an Unchecked_Union and forces the usage
|
|
-- of the inferred discriminant value of C as the right hand side
|
|
-- of the assignment.
|
|
|
|
function Make_Field_Assigns (CI : List_Id) return List_Id;
|
|
-- Given CI, a component items list, construct series of statements
|
|
-- for fieldwise assignment of the corresponding components.
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
-- Find_Component --
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
function Find_Component
|
|
(Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Comp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
Utyp : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Typ);
|
|
C : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
C := First_Entity (Utyp);
|
|
|
|
while Present (C) loop
|
|
if Chars (C) = Chars (Comp) then
|
|
return C;
|
|
end if;
|
|
Next_Entity (C);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
|
end Find_Component;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
-- Make_Component_List_Assign --
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Make_Component_List_Assign
|
|
(CL : Node_Id;
|
|
U_U : Boolean := False) return List_Id
|
|
is
|
|
CI : constant List_Id := Component_Items (CL);
|
|
VP : constant Node_Id := Variant_Part (CL);
|
|
|
|
Alts : List_Id;
|
|
DC : Node_Id;
|
|
DCH : List_Id;
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
Result : List_Id;
|
|
V : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Result := Make_Field_Assigns (CI);
|
|
|
|
if Present (VP) then
|
|
|
|
V := First_Non_Pragma (Variants (VP));
|
|
Alts := New_List;
|
|
while Present (V) loop
|
|
|
|
DCH := New_List;
|
|
DC := First (Discrete_Choices (V));
|
|
while Present (DC) loop
|
|
Append_To (DCH, New_Copy_Tree (DC));
|
|
Next (DC);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Alts,
|
|
Make_Case_Statement_Alternative (Loc,
|
|
Discrete_Choices => DCH,
|
|
Statements =>
|
|
Make_Component_List_Assign (Component_List (V))));
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (V);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If we have an Unchecked_Union, use the value of the inferred
|
|
-- discriminant of the variant part expression as the switch
|
|
-- for the case statement. The case statement may later be
|
|
-- folded.
|
|
|
|
if U_U then
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
New_Copy (Get_Discriminant_Value (
|
|
Entity (Name (VP)),
|
|
Etype (Rhs),
|
|
Discriminant_Constraint (Etype (Rhs))));
|
|
else
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Rhs),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars (Name (VP))));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Result,
|
|
Make_Case_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Expression => Expr,
|
|
Alternatives => Alts));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Make_Component_List_Assign;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Make_Field_Assign --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Make_Field_Assign
|
|
(C : Entity_Id;
|
|
U_U : Boolean := False) return Node_Id
|
|
is
|
|
A : Node_Id;
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In the case of an Unchecked_Union, use the discriminant
|
|
-- constraint value as on the right hand side of the assignment.
|
|
|
|
if U_U then
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
New_Copy (Get_Discriminant_Value (C,
|
|
Etype (Rhs),
|
|
Discriminant_Constraint (Etype (Rhs))));
|
|
else
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Rhs),
|
|
Selector_Name => New_Occurrence_Of (C, Loc));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
A :=
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Lhs),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Find_Component (L_Typ, C), Loc)),
|
|
Expression => Expr);
|
|
|
|
-- Set Assignment_OK, so discriminants can be assigned
|
|
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Name (A), True);
|
|
return A;
|
|
end Make_Field_Assign;
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Make_Field_Assigns --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Make_Field_Assigns (CI : List_Id) return List_Id is
|
|
Item : Node_Id;
|
|
Result : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Item := First (CI);
|
|
Result := New_List;
|
|
while Present (Item) loop
|
|
if Nkind (Item) = N_Component_Declaration then
|
|
Append_To
|
|
(Result, Make_Field_Assign (Defining_Identifier (Item)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Item);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Make_Field_Assigns;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Expand_Assign_Record
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Note that we use the base types for this processing. This results
|
|
-- in some extra work in the constrained case, but the change of
|
|
-- representation case is so unusual that it is not worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
-- First copy the discriminants. This is done unconditionally. It
|
|
-- is required in the unconstrained left side case, and also in the
|
|
-- case where this assignment was constructed during the expansion
|
|
-- of a type conversion (since initialization of discriminants is
|
|
-- suppressed in this case). It is unnecessary but harmless in
|
|
-- other cases.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (L_Typ) then
|
|
F := First_Discriminant (R_Typ);
|
|
while Present (F) loop
|
|
|
|
if Is_Unchecked_Union (Base_Type (R_Typ)) then
|
|
Insert_Action (N, Make_Field_Assign (F, True));
|
|
else
|
|
Insert_Action (N, Make_Field_Assign (F));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Discriminant (F);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- We know the underlying type is a record, but its current view
|
|
-- may be private. We must retrieve the usable record declaration.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Decl) = N_Private_Type_Declaration
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (R_Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
RDef := Type_Definition (Declaration_Node (Full_View (R_Typ)));
|
|
else
|
|
RDef := Type_Definition (Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (RDef) = N_Record_Definition
|
|
and then Present (Component_List (RDef))
|
|
then
|
|
|
|
if Is_Unchecked_Union (R_Typ) then
|
|
Insert_Actions (N,
|
|
Make_Component_List_Assign (Component_List (RDef), True));
|
|
else
|
|
Insert_Actions
|
|
(N, Make_Component_List_Assign (Component_List (RDef)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end;
|
|
end Expand_Assign_Record;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Assignment_Statement --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- This procedure implements various cases where an assignment statement
|
|
-- cannot just be passed on to the back end in untransformed state.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Assignment_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Lhs : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
Rhs : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Etype (Lhs));
|
|
Exp : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-327): Handle assignment to priority of protected object
|
|
|
|
-- Rewrite an assignment to X'Priority into a run-time call.
|
|
|
|
-- For example: X'Priority := New_Prio_Expr;
|
|
-- ...is expanded into Set_Ceiling (X._Object, New_Prio_Expr);
|
|
|
|
-- Note that although X'Priority is notionally an object, it is quite
|
|
-- deliberately not defined as an aliased object in the RM. This means
|
|
-- that it works fine to rewrite it as a call, without having to worry
|
|
-- about complications that would other arise from X'Priority'Access,
|
|
-- which is illegal, because of the lack of aliasing.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_05 then
|
|
declare
|
|
Call : Node_Id;
|
|
Conctyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
Object_Parm : Node_Id;
|
|
Subprg : Entity_Id;
|
|
RT_Subprg_Name : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Handle chains of renamings
|
|
|
|
Ent := Name (N);
|
|
while Nkind (Ent) in N_Has_Entity
|
|
and then Present (Entity (Ent))
|
|
and then Present (Renamed_Object (Entity (Ent)))
|
|
loop
|
|
Ent := Renamed_Object (Entity (Ent));
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- The attribute Priority applied to protected objects has been
|
|
-- previously expanded into calls to the Get_Ceiling run-time
|
|
-- subprogram.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Ent) = N_Function_Call
|
|
and then (Entity (Name (Ent)) = RTE (RE_Get_Ceiling)
|
|
or else
|
|
Entity (Name (Ent)) = RTE (RO_PE_Get_Ceiling))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Look for the enclosing concurrent type
|
|
|
|
Conctyp := Current_Scope;
|
|
while not Is_Concurrent_Type (Conctyp) loop
|
|
Conctyp := Scope (Conctyp);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Protected_Type (Conctyp));
|
|
|
|
-- Generate the first actual of the call
|
|
|
|
Subprg := Current_Scope;
|
|
while not Present (Protected_Body_Subprogram (Subprg)) loop
|
|
Subprg := Scope (Subprg);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Object_Parm :=
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Reference_To
|
|
(First_Entity
|
|
(Protected_Body_Subprogram (Subprg)),
|
|
Loc),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
Make_Identifier (Loc, Name_uObject)),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Unchecked_Access);
|
|
|
|
-- Select the appropriate run-time call
|
|
|
|
if Number_Entries (Conctyp) = 0 then
|
|
RT_Subprg_Name :=
|
|
New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Set_Ceiling), Loc);
|
|
else
|
|
RT_Subprg_Name :=
|
|
New_Reference_To (RTE (RO_PE_Set_Ceiling), Loc);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Call :=
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => RT_Subprg_Name,
|
|
Parameter_Associations =>
|
|
New_List (Object_Parm,
|
|
Relocate_Node (Expression (N))));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Call);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- First deal with generation of range check if required. For now we do
|
|
-- this only for discrete types.
|
|
|
|
if Do_Range_Check (Rhs)
|
|
and then Is_Discrete_Type (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Do_Range_Check (Rhs, False);
|
|
Generate_Range_Check (Rhs, Typ, CE_Range_Check_Failed);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check for a special case where a high level transformation is
|
|
-- required. If we have either of:
|
|
|
|
-- P.field := rhs;
|
|
-- P (sub) := rhs;
|
|
|
|
-- where P is a reference to a bit packed array, then we have to unwind
|
|
-- the assignment. The exact meaning of being a reference to a bit
|
|
-- packed array is as follows:
|
|
|
|
-- An indexed component whose prefix is a bit packed array is a
|
|
-- reference to a bit packed array.
|
|
|
|
-- An indexed component or selected component whose prefix is a
|
|
-- reference to a bit packed array is itself a reference ot a
|
|
-- bit packed array.
|
|
|
|
-- The required transformation is
|
|
|
|
-- Tnn : prefix_type := P;
|
|
-- Tnn.field := rhs;
|
|
-- P := Tnn;
|
|
|
|
-- or
|
|
|
|
-- Tnn : prefix_type := P;
|
|
-- Tnn (subscr) := rhs;
|
|
-- P := Tnn;
|
|
|
|
-- Since P is going to be evaluated more than once, any subscripts
|
|
-- in P must have their evaluation forced.
|
|
|
|
if (Nkind (Lhs) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Lhs) = N_Selected_Component)
|
|
and then Is_Ref_To_Bit_Packed_Array (Prefix (Lhs))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
BPAR_Expr : constant Node_Id := Relocate_Node (Prefix (Lhs));
|
|
BPAR_Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (BPAR_Expr);
|
|
Tnn : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('T'));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Insert the post assignment first, because we want to copy
|
|
-- the BPAR_Expr tree before it gets analyzed in the context
|
|
-- of the pre assignment. Note that we do not analyze the
|
|
-- post assignment yet (we cannot till we have completed the
|
|
-- analysis of the pre assignment). As usual, the analysis
|
|
-- of this post assignment will happen on its own when we
|
|
-- "run into" it after finishing the current assignment.
|
|
|
|
Insert_After (N,
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Copy_Tree (BPAR_Expr),
|
|
Expression => New_Occurrence_Of (Tnn, Loc)));
|
|
|
|
-- At this stage BPAR_Expr is a reference to a bit packed
|
|
-- array where the reference was not expanded in the original
|
|
-- tree, since it was on the left side of an assignment. But
|
|
-- in the pre-assignment statement (the object definition),
|
|
-- BPAR_Expr will end up on the right hand side, and must be
|
|
-- reexpanded. To achieve this, we reset the analyzed flag
|
|
-- of all selected and indexed components down to the actual
|
|
-- indexed component for the packed array.
|
|
|
|
Exp := BPAR_Expr;
|
|
loop
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Exp, False);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Exp) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Exp) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
then
|
|
Exp := Prefix (Exp);
|
|
else
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Now we can insert and analyze the pre-assignment
|
|
|
|
-- If the right-hand side requires a transient scope, it has
|
|
-- already been placed on the stack. However, the declaration is
|
|
-- inserted in the tree outside of this scope, and must reflect
|
|
-- the proper scope for its variable. This awkward bit is forced
|
|
-- by the stricter scope discipline imposed by GCC 2.97.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Uses_Transient_Scope : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Scope_Is_Transient
|
|
and then N = Node_To_Be_Wrapped;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Uses_Transient_Scope then
|
|
New_Scope (Scope (Current_Scope));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Insert_Before_And_Analyze (N,
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Tnn,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (BPAR_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Expression => BPAR_Expr));
|
|
|
|
if Uses_Transient_Scope then
|
|
Pop_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Now fix up the original assignment and continue processing
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Prefix (Lhs),
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Tnn, Loc));
|
|
|
|
-- We do not need to reanalyze that assignment, and we do not need
|
|
-- to worry about references to the temporary, but we do need to
|
|
-- make sure that the temporary is not marked as a true constant
|
|
-- since we now have a generate assignment to it!
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_True_Constant (Tnn, False);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- When we have the appropriate type of aggregate in the
|
|
-- expression (it has been determined during analysis of the
|
|
-- aggregate by setting the delay flag), let's perform in place
|
|
-- assignment and thus avoid creating a temporay.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Delayed_Aggregate (Rhs) then
|
|
Convert_Aggr_In_Assignment (N);
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Apply discriminant check if required. If Lhs is an access type
|
|
-- to a designated type with discriminants, we must always check.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Etype (Lhs)) then
|
|
|
|
-- Skip discriminant check if change of representation. Will be
|
|
-- done when the change of representation is expanded out.
|
|
|
|
if not Change_Of_Representation (N) then
|
|
Apply_Discriminant_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs), Lhs);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the type is private without discriminants, and the full type
|
|
-- has discriminants (necessarily with defaults) a check may still be
|
|
-- necessary if the Lhs is aliased. The private determinants must be
|
|
-- visible to build the discriminant constraints.
|
|
|
|
-- Only an explicit dereference that comes from source indicates
|
|
-- aliasing. Access to formals of protected operations and entries
|
|
-- create dereferences but are not semantic aliasings.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Private_Type (Etype (Lhs))
|
|
and then Has_Discriminants (Typ)
|
|
and then Nkind (Lhs) = N_Explicit_Dereference
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Lhs)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Lt : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Lhs);
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Etype (Lhs, Typ);
|
|
Rewrite (Rhs, OK_Convert_To (Base_Type (Typ), Rhs));
|
|
Apply_Discriminant_Check (Rhs, Typ, Lhs);
|
|
Set_Etype (Lhs, Lt);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- If the Lhs has a private type with unknown discriminants, it
|
|
-- may have a full view with discriminants, but those are nameable
|
|
-- only in the underlying type, so convert the Rhs to it before
|
|
-- potential checking.
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Unknown_Discriminants (Base_Type (Etype (Lhs)))
|
|
and then Has_Discriminants (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (Rhs, OK_Convert_To (Base_Type (Typ), Rhs));
|
|
Apply_Discriminant_Check (Rhs, Typ, Lhs);
|
|
|
|
-- In the access type case, we need the same discriminant check,
|
|
-- and also range checks if we have an access to constrained array.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Lhs))
|
|
and then Is_Constrained (Designated_Type (Etype (Lhs)))
|
|
then
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Designated_Type (Etype (Lhs))) then
|
|
|
|
-- Skip discriminant check if change of representation. Will be
|
|
-- done when the change of representation is expanded out.
|
|
|
|
if not Change_Of_Representation (N) then
|
|
Apply_Discriminant_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Array_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (Lhs))) then
|
|
Apply_Range_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Constrained (Etype (Lhs)) then
|
|
Apply_Length_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Rhs) = N_Allocator then
|
|
declare
|
|
Target_Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Expression (Rhs));
|
|
C_Es : Check_Result;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
C_Es :=
|
|
Range_Check
|
|
(Lhs,
|
|
Target_Typ,
|
|
Etype (Designated_Type (Etype (Lhs))));
|
|
|
|
Insert_Range_Checks
|
|
(C_Es,
|
|
N,
|
|
Target_Typ,
|
|
Sloc (Lhs),
|
|
Lhs);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Apply range check for access type case
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Lhs))
|
|
and then Nkind (Rhs) = N_Allocator
|
|
and then Nkind (Expression (Rhs)) = N_Qualified_Expression
|
|
then
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Expression (Rhs));
|
|
Apply_Range_Check
|
|
(Expression (Rhs), Designated_Type (Etype (Lhs)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Generate the run-time check
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Lhs))
|
|
and then not Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Rhs))
|
|
then
|
|
Apply_Constraint_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of assignment to a bit packed array element
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Lhs) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
and then Is_Bit_Packed_Array (Etype (Prefix (Lhs)))
|
|
then
|
|
Expand_Bit_Packed_Element_Set (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Build-in-place function call case. Note that we're not yet doing
|
|
-- build-in-place for user-written assignment statements; the
|
|
-- assignment here came from can aggregate.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
|
|
and then Is_Build_In_Place_Function_Call (Rhs)
|
|
then
|
|
Make_Build_In_Place_Call_In_Assignment (N, Rhs);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Tagged_Type (Typ)
|
|
or else (Controlled_Type (Typ) and then not Is_Array_Type (Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Tagged_Case : declare
|
|
L : List_Id := No_List;
|
|
Expand_Ctrl_Actions : constant Boolean := not No_Ctrl_Actions (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In the controlled case, we need to make sure that function
|
|
-- calls are evaluated before finalizing the target. In all
|
|
-- cases, it makes the expansion easier if the side-effects
|
|
-- are removed first.
|
|
|
|
Remove_Side_Effects (Lhs);
|
|
Remove_Side_Effects (Rhs);
|
|
|
|
-- Avoid recursion in the mechanism
|
|
|
|
Set_Analyzed (N);
|
|
|
|
-- If dispatching assignment, we need to dispatch to _assign
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
|
|
-- If the type is tagged, we may as well use the predefined
|
|
-- primitive assignment. This avoids inlining a lot of code
|
|
-- and in the class-wide case, the assignment is replaced by
|
|
-- dispatch call to _assign. Note that this cannot be done
|
|
-- when discriminant checks are locally suppressed (as in
|
|
-- extension aggregate expansions) because otherwise the
|
|
-- discriminant check will be performed within the _assign
|
|
-- call. It is also suppressed for assignmments created by the
|
|
-- expander that correspond to initializations, where we do
|
|
-- want to copy the tag (No_Ctrl_Actions flag set True).
|
|
-- by the expander and we do not need to mess with tags ever
|
|
-- (Expand_Ctrl_Actions flag is set True in this case).
|
|
|
|
or else (Is_Tagged_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Chars (Current_Scope) /= Name_uAssign
|
|
and then Expand_Ctrl_Actions
|
|
and then not Discriminant_Checks_Suppressed (Empty))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Fetch the primitive op _assign and proper type to call
|
|
-- it. Because of possible conflits between private and
|
|
-- full view the proper type is fetched directly from the
|
|
-- operation profile.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Op : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Find_Prim_Op (Typ, Name_uAssign);
|
|
F_Typ : Entity_Id := Etype (First_Formal (Op));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If the assignment is dispatching, make sure to use the
|
|
-- proper type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ) then
|
|
F_Typ := Class_Wide_Type (F_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
L := New_List;
|
|
|
|
-- In case of assignment to a class-wide tagged type, before
|
|
-- the assignment we generate run-time check to ensure that
|
|
-- the tag of the Target is covered by the tag of the source
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Underlying_Type (Etype (Rhs)))
|
|
then
|
|
Append_To (L,
|
|
Make_Raise_Constraint_Error (Loc,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Not (Loc,
|
|
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_CW_Membership), Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => New_List (
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Lhs),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
Make_Identifier (Loc, Name_uTag)),
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Rhs),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
Make_Identifier (Loc, Name_uTag))))),
|
|
Reason => CE_Tag_Check_Failed));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Append_To (L,
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To (Op, Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => New_List (
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (F_Typ, Duplicate_Subexpr (Lhs)),
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (F_Typ,
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Rhs)))));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
L := Make_Tag_Ctrl_Assignment (N);
|
|
|
|
-- We can't afford to have destructive Finalization Actions
|
|
-- in the Self assignment case, so if the target and the
|
|
-- source are not obviously different, code is generated to
|
|
-- avoid the self assignment case
|
|
--
|
|
-- if lhs'address /= rhs'address then
|
|
-- <code for controlled and/or tagged assignment>
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
if not Statically_Different (Lhs, Rhs)
|
|
and then Expand_Ctrl_Actions
|
|
then
|
|
L := New_List (
|
|
Make_Implicit_If_Statement (N,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Ne (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Lhs),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Address),
|
|
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Rhs),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Address)),
|
|
|
|
Then_Statements => L));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- We need to set up an exception handler for implementing
|
|
-- 7.6.1 (18). The remaining adjustments are tackled by the
|
|
-- implementation of adjust for record_controllers (see
|
|
-- s-finimp.adb)
|
|
|
|
-- This is skipped if we have no finalization
|
|
|
|
if Expand_Ctrl_Actions
|
|
and then not Restriction_Active (No_Finalization)
|
|
then
|
|
L := New_List (
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => L,
|
|
Exception_Handlers => New_List (
|
|
Make_Exception_Handler (Loc,
|
|
Exception_Choices =>
|
|
New_List (Make_Others_Choice (Loc)),
|
|
Statements => New_List (
|
|
Make_Raise_Program_Error (Loc,
|
|
Reason =>
|
|
PE_Finalize_Raised_Exception)
|
|
))))));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc, Statements => L)));
|
|
|
|
-- If no restrictions on aborts, protect the whole assignement
|
|
-- for controlled objects as per 9.8(11)
|
|
|
|
if Controlled_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Expand_Ctrl_Actions
|
|
and then Abort_Allowed
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Blk : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
New_Internal_Entity
|
|
(E_Block, Current_Scope, Sloc (N), 'B');
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Scope (Blk, Current_Scope);
|
|
Set_Etype (Blk, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
Set_Identifier (N, New_Occurrence_Of (Blk, Sloc (N)));
|
|
|
|
Prepend_To (L, Build_Runtime_Call (Loc, RE_Abort_Defer));
|
|
Set_At_End_Proc (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N),
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (RTE (RE_Abort_Undefer_Direct), Loc));
|
|
Expand_At_End_Handler
|
|
(Handled_Statement_Sequence (N), Blk);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- N has been rewritten to a block statement for which it is
|
|
-- known by construction that no checks are necessary: analyze
|
|
-- it with all checks suppressed.
|
|
|
|
Analyze (N, Suppress => All_Checks);
|
|
return;
|
|
end Tagged_Case;
|
|
|
|
-- Array types
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Array_Type (Typ) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Actual_Rhs : Node_Id := Rhs;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Nkind (Actual_Rhs) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Actual_Rhs) = N_Qualified_Expression
|
|
loop
|
|
Actual_Rhs := Expression (Actual_Rhs);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Expand_Assign_Array (N, Actual_Rhs);
|
|
return;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Record types
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Record_Type (Typ) then
|
|
Expand_Assign_Record (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Scalar types. This is where we perform the processing related
|
|
-- to the requirements of (RM 13.9.1(9-11)) concerning the handling
|
|
-- of invalid scalar values.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Scalar_Type (Typ) then
|
|
|
|
-- Case where right side is known valid
|
|
|
|
if Expr_Known_Valid (Rhs) then
|
|
|
|
-- Here the right side is valid, so it is fine. The case to
|
|
-- deal with is when the left side is a local variable reference
|
|
-- whose value is not currently known to be valid. If this is
|
|
-- the case, and the assignment appears in an unconditional
|
|
-- context, then we can mark the left side as now being valid.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Local_Variable_Reference (Lhs)
|
|
and then not Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs))
|
|
and then In_Unconditional_Context (N)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs), True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where right side may be invalid in the sense of the RM
|
|
-- reference above. The RM does not require that we check for
|
|
-- the validity on an assignment, but it does require that the
|
|
-- assignment of an invalid value not cause erroneous behavior.
|
|
|
|
-- The general approach in GNAT is to use the Is_Known_Valid flag
|
|
-- to avoid the need for validity checking on assignments. However
|
|
-- in some cases, we have to do validity checking in order to make
|
|
-- sure that the setting of this flag is correct.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Validate right side if we are validating copies
|
|
|
|
if Validity_Checks_On
|
|
and then Validity_Check_Copies
|
|
then
|
|
-- Skip this if left hand side is an array or record component
|
|
-- and elementary component validity checks are suppressed.
|
|
|
|
if (Nkind (Lhs) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Lhs) = N_Indexed_Component)
|
|
and then not Validity_Check_Components
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
else
|
|
Ensure_Valid (Rhs);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- We can propagate this to the left side where appropriate
|
|
|
|
if Is_Local_Variable_Reference (Lhs)
|
|
and then not Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs))
|
|
and then In_Unconditional_Context (N)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs), True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise check to see what should be done
|
|
|
|
-- If left side is a local variable, then we just set its
|
|
-- flag to indicate that its value may no longer be valid,
|
|
-- since we are copying a potentially invalid value.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Local_Variable_Reference (Lhs) then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs), False);
|
|
|
|
-- Check for case of a nonlocal variable on the left side
|
|
-- which is currently known to be valid. In this case, we
|
|
-- simply ensure that the right side is valid. We only play
|
|
-- the game of copying validity status for local variables,
|
|
-- since we are doing this statically, not by tracing the
|
|
-- full flow graph.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (Lhs)
|
|
and then Is_Known_Valid (Entity (Lhs))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Note that the Ensure_Valid call is ignored if the
|
|
-- Validity_Checking mode is set to none so we do not
|
|
-- need to worry about that case here.
|
|
|
|
Ensure_Valid (Rhs);
|
|
|
|
-- In all other cases, we can safely copy an invalid value
|
|
-- without worrying about the status of the left side. Since
|
|
-- it is not a variable reference it will not be considered
|
|
-- as being known to be valid in any case.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Defend against invalid subscripts on left side if we are in
|
|
-- standard validity checking mode. No need to do this if we
|
|
-- are checking all subscripts.
|
|
|
|
if Validity_Checks_On
|
|
and then Validity_Check_Default
|
|
and then not Validity_Check_Subscripts
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Valid_Lvalue_Subscripts (Lhs);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
exception
|
|
when RE_Not_Available =>
|
|
return;
|
|
end Expand_N_Assignment_Statement;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Block_Statement --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- Encode entity names defined in block statement
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Block_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Qualify_Entity_Names (N);
|
|
end Expand_N_Block_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Case_Statement --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Case_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
Alt : Node_Id;
|
|
Len : Nat;
|
|
Cond : Node_Id;
|
|
Choice : Node_Id;
|
|
Chlist : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Check for the situation where we know at compile time which
|
|
-- branch will be taken
|
|
|
|
if Compile_Time_Known_Value (Expr) then
|
|
Alt := Find_Static_Alternative (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Move the statements from this alternative after the case
|
|
-- statement. They are already analyzed, so will be skipped
|
|
-- by the analyzer.
|
|
|
|
Insert_List_After (N, Statements (Alt));
|
|
|
|
-- That leaves the case statement as a shell. So now we can kill all
|
|
-- other alternatives in the case statement.
|
|
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Expression (N));
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
A : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Loop through case alternatives, skipping pragmas, and skipping
|
|
-- the one alternative that we select (and therefore retain).
|
|
|
|
A := First (Alternatives (N));
|
|
while Present (A) loop
|
|
if A /= Alt
|
|
and then Nkind (A) = N_Case_Statement_Alternative
|
|
then
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Statements (A), Warn_On_Deleted_Code);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (A);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Here if the choice is not determined at compile time
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Last_Alt : constant Node_Id := Last (Alternatives (N));
|
|
|
|
Others_Present : Boolean;
|
|
Others_Node : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Then_Stms : List_Id;
|
|
Else_Stms : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (First (Discrete_Choices (Last_Alt))) = N_Others_Choice then
|
|
Others_Present := True;
|
|
Others_Node := Last_Alt;
|
|
else
|
|
Others_Present := False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- First step is to worry about possible invalid argument. The RM
|
|
-- requires (RM 5.4(13)) that if the result is invalid (e.g. it is
|
|
-- outside the base range), then Constraint_Error must be raised.
|
|
|
|
-- Case of validity check required (validity checks are on, the
|
|
-- expression is not known to be valid, and the case statement
|
|
-- comes from source -- no need to validity check internally
|
|
-- generated case statements).
|
|
|
|
if Validity_Check_Default then
|
|
Ensure_Valid (Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there is only a single alternative, just replace it with
|
|
-- the sequence of statements since obviously that is what is
|
|
-- going to be executed in all cases.
|
|
|
|
Len := List_Length (Alternatives (N));
|
|
|
|
if Len = 1 then
|
|
-- We still need to evaluate the expression if it has any
|
|
-- side effects.
|
|
|
|
Remove_Side_Effects (Expression (N));
|
|
|
|
Insert_List_After (N, Statements (First (Alternatives (N))));
|
|
|
|
-- That leaves the case statement as a shell. The alternative
|
|
-- that will be executed is reset to a null list. So now we can
|
|
-- kill the entire case statement.
|
|
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Expression (N));
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- An optimization. If there are only two alternatives, and only
|
|
-- a single choice, then rewrite the whole case statement as an
|
|
-- if statement, since this can result in susbequent optimizations.
|
|
-- This helps not only with case statements in the source of a
|
|
-- simple form, but also with generated code (discriminant check
|
|
-- functions in particular)
|
|
|
|
if Len = 2 then
|
|
Chlist := Discrete_Choices (First (Alternatives (N)));
|
|
|
|
if List_Length (Chlist) = 1 then
|
|
Choice := First (Chlist);
|
|
|
|
Then_Stms := Statements (First (Alternatives (N)));
|
|
Else_Stms := Statements (Last (Alternatives (N)));
|
|
|
|
-- For TRUE, generate "expression", not expression = true
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Choice) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Entity (Choice) = Standard_True
|
|
then
|
|
Cond := Expression (N);
|
|
|
|
-- For FALSE, generate "expression" and switch then/else
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Choice) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Entity (Choice) = Standard_False
|
|
then
|
|
Cond := Expression (N);
|
|
Else_Stms := Statements (First (Alternatives (N)));
|
|
Then_Stms := Statements (Last (Alternatives (N)));
|
|
|
|
-- For a range, generate "expression in range"
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Choice) = N_Range
|
|
or else (Nkind (Choice) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Attribute_Name (Choice) = Name_Range)
|
|
or else (Is_Entity_Name (Choice)
|
|
and then Is_Type (Entity (Choice)))
|
|
or else Nkind (Choice) = N_Subtype_Indication
|
|
then
|
|
Cond :=
|
|
Make_In (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd => Expression (N),
|
|
Right_Opnd => Relocate_Node (Choice));
|
|
|
|
-- For any other subexpression "expression = value"
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Cond :=
|
|
Make_Op_Eq (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd => Expression (N),
|
|
Right_Opnd => Relocate_Node (Choice));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Now rewrite the case as an IF
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_If_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Condition => Cond,
|
|
Then_Statements => Then_Stms,
|
|
Else_Statements => Else_Stms));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the last alternative is not an Others choice, replace it
|
|
-- with an N_Others_Choice. Note that we do not bother to call
|
|
-- Analyze on the modified case statement, since it's only effect
|
|
-- would be to compute the contents of the Others_Discrete_Choices
|
|
-- which is not needed by the back end anyway.
|
|
|
|
-- The reason we do this is that the back end always needs some
|
|
-- default for a switch, so if we have not supplied one in the
|
|
-- processing above for validity checking, then we need to
|
|
-- supply one here.
|
|
|
|
if not Others_Present then
|
|
Others_Node := Make_Others_Choice (Sloc (Last_Alt));
|
|
Set_Others_Discrete_Choices
|
|
(Others_Node, Discrete_Choices (Last_Alt));
|
|
Set_Discrete_Choices (Last_Alt, New_List (Others_Node));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end Expand_N_Case_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Exit_Statement --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- The only processing required is to deal with a possible C/Fortran
|
|
-- boolean value used as the condition for the exit statement.
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Exit_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Condition (N));
|
|
end Expand_N_Exit_Statement;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement --
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- If there is a Handled_Statement_Sequence, we rewrite this:
|
|
|
|
-- return Result : T := <expression> do
|
|
-- <handled_seq_of_stms>
|
|
-- end return;
|
|
|
|
-- to be:
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- Result : T := <expression>;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- <handled_seq_of_stms>
|
|
-- return Result;
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise (no Handled_Statement_Sequence), we rewrite this:
|
|
|
|
-- return Result : T := <expression>;
|
|
|
|
-- to be:
|
|
|
|
-- return <expression>;
|
|
|
|
-- unless it's build-in-place or there's no <expression>, in which case
|
|
-- we generate:
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- Result : T := <expression>;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- return Result;
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- Note that this case could have been written by the user as an extended
|
|
-- return statement, or could have been transformed to this from a simple
|
|
-- return statement.
|
|
|
|
-- That is, we need to have a reified return object if there are statements
|
|
-- (which might refer to it) or if we're doing build-in-place (so we can
|
|
-- set its address to the final resting place -- but that key part is not
|
|
-- yet implemented) or if there is no expression (in which case default
|
|
-- initial values might need to be set).
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
|
|
function Is_Build_In_Place_Function (Fun : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- F must be of type E_Function or E_Generic_Function. Return True if it
|
|
-- uses build-in-place for the result object. In Ada 95, this must be
|
|
-- False for inherently limited result type. In Ada 2005, this must be
|
|
-- True for inherently limited result type. For other types, we have a
|
|
-- choice -- build-in-place is usually more efficient for large things,
|
|
-- and less efficient for small things. However, we had better not use
|
|
-- build-in-place if the Convention is other than Ada, because that
|
|
-- would disturb mixed-language programs.
|
|
--
|
|
-- Note that for the non-inherently-limited cases, we must make the same
|
|
-- decision for Ada 95 and 2005, so that mixed-dialect programs work.
|
|
--
|
|
-- ???This function will be needed when compiling the call sites;
|
|
-- we will have to move it to a more global place.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Build_In_Place_Function --
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Build_In_Place_Function (Fun : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
R_Type : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Etype (Fun));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- First, the cases that matter for correctness
|
|
|
|
if Is_Inherently_Limited_Type (R_Type) then
|
|
return Ada_Version >= Ada_05 and then not Debug_Flag_Dot_L;
|
|
|
|
-- Note: If you have Convention (C) on an inherently limited
|
|
-- type, you're on your own. That is, the C code will have to be
|
|
-- carefully written to know about the Ada conventions.
|
|
|
|
elsif
|
|
Has_Foreign_Convention (R_Type)
|
|
or else
|
|
Has_Foreign_Convention (Fun)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- Second, the efficiency-related decisions. It would be obnoxiously
|
|
-- inefficient to use build-in-place for elementary types. For
|
|
-- composites, we could return False if the subtype is known to be
|
|
-- small (<= one or two words?) but we don't bother with that yet.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return Is_Composite_Type (R_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_Build_In_Place_Function;
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Local Declarations --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
|
|
Return_Object_Entity : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
First_Entity (Return_Statement_Entity (N));
|
|
Return_Object_Decl : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Parent (Return_Object_Entity);
|
|
Parent_Function : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N));
|
|
Is_Build_In_Place : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Is_Build_In_Place_Function (Parent_Function);
|
|
|
|
Return_Stm : Node_Id;
|
|
Handled_Stm_Seq : Node_Id;
|
|
Result : Node_Id;
|
|
Exp : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Return_Object_Decl) = N_Object_Declaration then
|
|
Exp := Expression (Return_Object_Decl);
|
|
else
|
|
Exp := Empty;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Handled_Stm_Seq := Handled_Statement_Sequence (N);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Handled_Stm_Seq)
|
|
or else Is_Build_In_Place
|
|
or else No (Exp)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Build simple_return_statement that returns the return object
|
|
|
|
Return_Stm :=
|
|
Make_Return_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Expression => New_Occurrence_Of (Return_Object_Entity, Loc));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Handled_Stm_Seq) then
|
|
Handled_Stm_Seq :=
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (Handled_Stm_Seq, Return_Stm));
|
|
else
|
|
Handled_Stm_Seq :=
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (Return_Stm));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Present (Handled_Stm_Seq));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where we build a block
|
|
|
|
if Present (Handled_Stm_Seq) then
|
|
Result :=
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Declarations => Return_Object_Declarations (N),
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence => Handled_Stm_Seq);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Build_In_Place then
|
|
|
|
-- Locate the implicit access parameter associated with the
|
|
-- the caller-supplied return object and convert the return
|
|
-- statement's return object declaration to a renaming of a
|
|
-- dereference of the access parameter. If the return object's
|
|
-- declaration includes an expression that has not already been
|
|
-- expanded as separate assignments, then add an assignment
|
|
-- statement to ensure the return object gets initialized.
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- Result : T [:= <expression>];
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- ...
|
|
|
|
-- is converted to
|
|
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- Result : T renames FuncRA.all;
|
|
-- [Result := <expression;]
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- ...
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Return_Obj_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Defining_Identifier (Return_Object_Decl);
|
|
Return_Obj_Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Return_Obj_Id);
|
|
Return_Obj_Expr : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Expression (Return_Object_Decl);
|
|
Obj_Acc_Formal : Entity_Id := Extra_Formals (Parent_Function);
|
|
Obj_Acc_Deref : Node_Id;
|
|
Init_Assignment : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Build-in-place results must be returned by reference
|
|
|
|
Set_By_Ref (Return_Stm);
|
|
|
|
-- Locate the implicit access parameter passed by the caller.
|
|
-- It might be better to search for that with a symbol table
|
|
-- lookup, but for now we traverse the extra actuals to find
|
|
-- the access parameter (currently there can only be one).
|
|
|
|
while Present (Obj_Acc_Formal) loop
|
|
exit when
|
|
Ekind (Etype (Obj_Acc_Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type;
|
|
Next_Formal_With_Extras (Obj_Acc_Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- ??? pragma Assert (Present (Obj_Acc_Formal));
|
|
|
|
-- For now we only rewrite the object if we can locate the
|
|
-- implicit access parameter. Normally there should be one
|
|
-- if Build_In_Place is true, but at the moment it's only
|
|
-- created in the more restrictive case of constrained
|
|
-- inherently limited result subtypes. ???
|
|
|
|
if Present (Obj_Acc_Formal) then
|
|
|
|
-- If the return object's declaration includes an expression
|
|
-- and the declaration isn't marked as No_Initialization,
|
|
-- then we need to generate an assignment to the object and
|
|
-- insert it after the declaration before rewriting it as
|
|
-- a renaming (otherwise we'll lose the initialization).
|
|
|
|
if Present (Return_Obj_Expr)
|
|
and then not No_Initialization (Return_Object_Decl)
|
|
then
|
|
Init_Assignment :=
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To (Return_Obj_Id, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Return_Obj_Expr));
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Name (Init_Assignment));
|
|
Set_No_Ctrl_Actions (Init_Assignment);
|
|
|
|
-- ??? Should we be setting the parent of the expression
|
|
-- here?
|
|
-- Set_Parent
|
|
-- (Expression (Init_Assignment), Init_Assignment);
|
|
|
|
Set_Expression (Return_Object_Decl, Empty);
|
|
|
|
Insert_After (Return_Object_Decl, Init_Assignment);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Replace the return object declaration with a renaming
|
|
-- of a dereference of the implicit access formal.
|
|
|
|
Obj_Acc_Deref :=
|
|
Make_Explicit_Dereference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Reference_To (Obj_Acc_Formal, Loc));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Return_Object_Decl,
|
|
Make_Object_Renaming_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Return_Obj_Id,
|
|
Access_Definition => Empty,
|
|
Subtype_Mark => New_Occurrence_Of
|
|
(Return_Obj_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Name => Obj_Acc_Deref));
|
|
|
|
Set_Renamed_Object (Return_Obj_Id, Obj_Acc_Deref);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where we do not build a block
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- We're about to drop Return_Object_Declarations on the floor, so
|
|
-- we need to insert it, in case it got expanded into useful code.
|
|
|
|
Insert_List_Before (N, Return_Object_Declarations (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Build simple_return_statement that returns the expression directly
|
|
|
|
Return_Stm := Make_Return_Statement (Loc, Expression => Exp);
|
|
|
|
Result := Return_Stm;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Set the flag to prevent infinite recursion
|
|
|
|
Set_Comes_From_Extended_Return_Statement (Return_Stm);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Result);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Goto_Statement --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- Add poll before goto if polling active
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Goto_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Generate_Poll_Call (N);
|
|
end Expand_N_Goto_Statement;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_If_Statement --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- First we deal with the case of C and Fortran convention boolean
|
|
-- values, with zero/non-zero semantics.
|
|
|
|
-- Second, we deal with the obvious rewriting for the cases where the
|
|
-- condition of the IF is known at compile time to be True or False.
|
|
|
|
-- Third, we remove elsif parts which have non-empty Condition_Actions
|
|
-- and rewrite as independent if statements. For example:
|
|
|
|
-- if x then xs
|
|
-- elsif y then ys
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
-- becomes
|
|
--
|
|
-- if x then xs
|
|
-- else
|
|
-- <<condition actions of y>>
|
|
-- if y then ys
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
-- This rewriting is needed if at least one elsif part has a non-empty
|
|
-- Condition_Actions list. We also do the same processing if there is
|
|
-- a constant condition in an elsif part (in conjunction with the first
|
|
-- processing step mentioned above, for the recursive call made to deal
|
|
-- with the created inner if, this deals with properly optimizing the
|
|
-- cases of constant elsif conditions).
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_If_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Hed : Node_Id;
|
|
E : Node_Id;
|
|
New_If : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Condition (N));
|
|
|
|
-- The following loop deals with constant conditions for the IF. We
|
|
-- need a loop because as we eliminate False conditions, we grab the
|
|
-- first elsif condition and use it as the primary condition.
|
|
|
|
while Compile_Time_Known_Value (Condition (N)) loop
|
|
|
|
-- If condition is True, we can simply rewrite the if statement
|
|
-- now by replacing it by the series of then statements.
|
|
|
|
if Is_True (Expr_Value (Condition (N))) then
|
|
|
|
-- All the else parts can be killed
|
|
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Elsif_Parts (N), Warn_On_Deleted_Code);
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Else_Statements (N), Warn_On_Deleted_Code);
|
|
|
|
Hed := Remove_Head (Then_Statements (N));
|
|
Insert_List_After (N, Then_Statements (N));
|
|
Rewrite (N, Hed);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If condition is False, then we can delete the condition and
|
|
-- the Then statements
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- We do not delete the condition if constant condition
|
|
-- warnings are enabled, since otherwise we end up deleting
|
|
-- the desired warning. Of course the backend will get rid
|
|
-- of this True/False test anyway, so nothing is lost here.
|
|
|
|
if not Constant_Condition_Warnings then
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Condition (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Kill_Dead_Code (Then_Statements (N), Warn_On_Deleted_Code);
|
|
|
|
-- If there are no elsif statements, then we simply replace
|
|
-- the entire if statement by the sequence of else statements.
|
|
|
|
if No (Elsif_Parts (N)) then
|
|
if No (Else_Statements (N))
|
|
or else Is_Empty_List (Else_Statements (N))
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Null_Statement (Sloc (N)));
|
|
else
|
|
Hed := Remove_Head (Else_Statements (N));
|
|
Insert_List_After (N, Else_Statements (N));
|
|
Rewrite (N, Hed);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If there are elsif statements, the first of them becomes
|
|
-- the if/then section of the rebuilt if statement This is
|
|
-- the case where we loop to reprocess this copied condition.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Hed := Remove_Head (Elsif_Parts (N));
|
|
Insert_Actions (N, Condition_Actions (Hed));
|
|
Set_Condition (N, Condition (Hed));
|
|
Set_Then_Statements (N, Then_Statements (Hed));
|
|
|
|
-- Hed might have been captured as the condition determining
|
|
-- the current value for an entity. Now it is detached from
|
|
-- the tree, so a Current_Value pointer in the condition might
|
|
-- need to be updated.
|
|
|
|
Set_Current_Value_Condition (N);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Empty_List (Elsif_Parts (N)) then
|
|
Set_Elsif_Parts (N, No_List);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Loop through elsif parts, dealing with constant conditions and
|
|
-- possible expression actions that are present.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Elsif_Parts (N)) then
|
|
E := First (Elsif_Parts (N));
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Condition (E));
|
|
|
|
-- If there are condition actions, then we rewrite the if
|
|
-- statement as indicated above. We also do the same rewrite
|
|
-- if the condition is True or False. The further processing
|
|
-- of this constant condition is then done by the recursive
|
|
-- call to expand the newly created if statement
|
|
|
|
if Present (Condition_Actions (E))
|
|
or else Compile_Time_Known_Value (Condition (E))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Note this is not an implicit if statement, since it is
|
|
-- part of an explicit if statement in the source (or of an
|
|
-- implicit if statement that has already been tested).
|
|
|
|
New_If :=
|
|
Make_If_Statement (Sloc (E),
|
|
Condition => Condition (E),
|
|
Then_Statements => Then_Statements (E),
|
|
Elsif_Parts => No_List,
|
|
Else_Statements => Else_Statements (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Elsif parts for new if come from remaining elsif's of parent
|
|
|
|
while Present (Next (E)) loop
|
|
if No (Elsif_Parts (New_If)) then
|
|
Set_Elsif_Parts (New_If, New_List);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Append (Remove_Next (E), Elsif_Parts (New_If));
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Set_Else_Statements (N, New_List (New_If));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Condition_Actions (E)) then
|
|
Insert_List_Before (New_If, Condition_Actions (E));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Remove (E);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Empty_List (Elsif_Parts (N)) then
|
|
Set_Elsif_Parts (N, No_List);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze (New_If);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- No special processing for that elsif part, move to next
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Next (E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Some more optimizations applicable if we still have an IF statement
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) /= N_If_Statement then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Another optimization, special cases that can be simplified
|
|
|
|
-- if expression then
|
|
-- return true;
|
|
-- else
|
|
-- return false;
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
-- can be changed to:
|
|
|
|
-- return expression;
|
|
|
|
-- and
|
|
|
|
-- if expression then
|
|
-- return false;
|
|
-- else
|
|
-- return true;
|
|
-- end if;
|
|
|
|
-- can be changed to:
|
|
|
|
-- return not (expression);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_If_Statement
|
|
and then No (Elsif_Parts (N))
|
|
and then Present (Else_Statements (N))
|
|
and then List_Length (Then_Statements (N)) = 1
|
|
and then List_Length (Else_Statements (N)) = 1
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Then_Stm : constant Node_Id := First (Then_Statements (N));
|
|
Else_Stm : constant Node_Id := First (Else_Statements (N));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Then_Stm) = N_Return_Statement
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Else_Stm) = N_Return_Statement
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Then_Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (Then_Stm);
|
|
Else_Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (Else_Stm);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Then_Expr) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Else_Expr) = N_Identifier
|
|
then
|
|
if Entity (Then_Expr) = Standard_True
|
|
and then Entity (Else_Expr) = Standard_False
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Return_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Condition (N))));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Entity (Then_Expr) = Standard_False
|
|
and then Entity (Else_Expr) = Standard_True
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Return_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Op_Not (Loc,
|
|
Right_Opnd => Relocate_Node (Condition (N)))));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Expand_N_If_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Loop_Statement --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- 1. Deal with while condition for C/Fortran boolean
|
|
-- 2. Deal with loops with a non-standard enumeration type range
|
|
-- 3. Deal with while loops where Condition_Actions is set
|
|
-- 4. Insert polling call if required
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Loop_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Isc : constant Node_Id := Iteration_Scheme (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Isc) then
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Condition (Isc));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Non_Empty_List (Statements (N)) then
|
|
Generate_Poll_Call (First (Statements (N)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Nothing more to do for plain loop with no iteration scheme
|
|
|
|
if No (Isc) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Note: we do not have to worry about validity chekcing of the for loop
|
|
-- range bounds here, since they were frozen with constant declarations
|
|
-- and it is during that process that the validity checking is done.
|
|
|
|
-- Handle the case where we have a for loop with the range type being
|
|
-- an enumeration type with non-standard representation. In this case
|
|
-- we expand:
|
|
|
|
-- for x in [reverse] a .. b loop
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- to
|
|
|
|
-- for xP in [reverse] integer
|
|
-- range etype'Pos (a) .. etype'Pos (b) loop
|
|
-- declare
|
|
-- x : constant etype := Pos_To_Rep (xP);
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end;
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Loop_Parameter_Specification (Isc)) then
|
|
declare
|
|
LPS : constant Node_Id := Loop_Parameter_Specification (Isc);
|
|
Loop_Id : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Identifier (LPS);
|
|
Ltype : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Loop_Id);
|
|
Btype : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Ltype);
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not Is_Enumeration_Type (Btype)
|
|
or else No (Enum_Pos_To_Rep (Btype))
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
New_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_External_Name (Chars (Loop_Id), 'P'));
|
|
|
|
-- If the type has a contiguous representation, successive
|
|
-- values can be generated as offsets from the first literal.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Contiguous_Rep (Btype) then
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (Btype,
|
|
Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
Enumeration_Rep (First_Literal (Btype))),
|
|
Right_Opnd => New_Reference_To (New_Id, Loc)));
|
|
else
|
|
-- Use the constructed array Enum_Pos_To_Rep
|
|
|
|
Expr :=
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Reference_To (Enum_Pos_To_Rep (Btype), Loc),
|
|
Expressions => New_List (New_Reference_To (New_Id, Loc)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Loop_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Identifier => Identifier (N),
|
|
|
|
Iteration_Scheme =>
|
|
Make_Iteration_Scheme (Loc,
|
|
Loop_Parameter_Specification =>
|
|
Make_Loop_Parameter_Specification (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => New_Id,
|
|
Reverse_Present => Reverse_Present (LPS),
|
|
|
|
Discrete_Subtype_Definition =>
|
|
Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
|
|
|
|
Subtype_Mark =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (Standard_Natural, Loc),
|
|
|
|
Constraint =>
|
|
Make_Range_Constraint (Loc,
|
|
Range_Expression =>
|
|
Make_Range (Loc,
|
|
|
|
Low_Bound =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (Btype, Loc),
|
|
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Pos,
|
|
|
|
Expressions => New_List (
|
|
Relocate_Node
|
|
(Type_Low_Bound (Ltype)))),
|
|
|
|
High_Bound =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (Btype, Loc),
|
|
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Pos,
|
|
|
|
Expressions => New_List (
|
|
Relocate_Node
|
|
(Type_High_Bound (Ltype))))))))),
|
|
|
|
Statements => New_List (
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Declarations => New_List (
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Loop_Id,
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Reference_To (Ltype, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Expr)),
|
|
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => Statements (N)))),
|
|
|
|
End_Label => End_Label (N)));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Second case, if we have a while loop with Condition_Actions set,
|
|
-- then we change it into a plain loop:
|
|
|
|
-- while C loop
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- changed to:
|
|
|
|
-- loop
|
|
-- <<condition actions>>
|
|
-- exit when not C;
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end loop
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Isc)
|
|
and then Present (Condition_Actions (Isc))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
ES : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
ES :=
|
|
Make_Exit_Statement (Sloc (Condition (Isc)),
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Not (Sloc (Condition (Isc)),
|
|
Right_Opnd => Condition (Isc)));
|
|
|
|
Prepend (ES, Statements (N));
|
|
Insert_List_Before (ES, Condition_Actions (Isc));
|
|
|
|
-- This is not an implicit loop, since it is generated in
|
|
-- response to the loop statement being processed. If this
|
|
-- is itself implicit, the restriction has already been
|
|
-- checked. If not, it is an explicit loop.
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Loop_Statement (Sloc (N),
|
|
Identifier => Identifier (N),
|
|
Statements => Statements (N),
|
|
End_Label => End_Label (N)));
|
|
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Expand_N_Loop_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_N_Return_Statement --
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_N_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Exp : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
Exptyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
T : Entity_Id;
|
|
Utyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
Scope_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Kind : Entity_Kind;
|
|
Call : Node_Id;
|
|
Acc_Stat : Node_Id;
|
|
Goto_Stat : Node_Id;
|
|
Lab_Node : Node_Id;
|
|
Cur_Idx : Nat;
|
|
Return_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Result_Exp : Node_Id;
|
|
Result_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Result_Obj : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Enable_New_Return_Processing then -- ???Temporary hack
|
|
Expand_Simple_Return (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where returned expression is present
|
|
|
|
if Present (Exp) then
|
|
|
|
-- Always normalize C/Fortran boolean result. This is not always
|
|
-- necessary, but it seems a good idea to minimize the passing
|
|
-- around of non-normalized values, and in any case this handles
|
|
-- the processing of barrier functions for protected types, which
|
|
-- turn the condition into a return statement.
|
|
|
|
Exptyp := Etype (Exp);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Boolean_Type (Exptyp)
|
|
and then Nonzero_Is_True (Exptyp)
|
|
then
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Exp);
|
|
Adjust_Result_Type (Exp, Exptyp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Do validity check if enabled for returns
|
|
|
|
if Validity_Checks_On
|
|
and then Validity_Check_Returns
|
|
then
|
|
Ensure_Valid (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Find relevant enclosing scope from which return is returning
|
|
|
|
Cur_Idx := Scope_Stack.Last;
|
|
loop
|
|
Scope_Id := Scope_Stack.Table (Cur_Idx).Entity;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scope_Id) /= E_Block
|
|
and then Ekind (Scope_Id) /= E_Loop
|
|
then
|
|
exit;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Cur_Idx := Cur_Idx - 1;
|
|
pragma Assert (Cur_Idx >= 0);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
-- ???I believe the above code is no longer necessary
|
|
pragma Assert (Scope_Id =
|
|
Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N)));
|
|
|
|
if No (Exp) then
|
|
Kind := Ekind (Scope_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a return from procedures do no extra steps
|
|
|
|
if Kind = E_Procedure or else Kind = E_Generic_Procedure then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Entry (Scope_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- Look at the enclosing block to see whether the return is from
|
|
-- an accept statement or an entry body.
|
|
|
|
for J in reverse 0 .. Cur_Idx loop
|
|
Scope_Id := Scope_Stack.Table (J).Entity;
|
|
exit when Is_Concurrent_Type (Scope_Id);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a return from accept statement it should be expanded
|
|
-- as a call to RTS Complete_Rendezvous and a goto to the end of
|
|
-- the accept body.
|
|
|
|
-- (cf : Expand_N_Accept_Statement, Expand_N_Selective_Accept,
|
|
-- Expand_N_Accept_Alternative in exp_ch9.adb)
|
|
|
|
if Is_Task_Type (Scope_Id) then
|
|
|
|
Call := (Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Complete_Rendezvous), Loc)));
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Call);
|
|
-- why not insert actions here???
|
|
Analyze (Call);
|
|
|
|
Acc_Stat := Parent (N);
|
|
while Nkind (Acc_Stat) /= N_Accept_Statement loop
|
|
Acc_Stat := Parent (Acc_Stat);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Lab_Node := Last (Statements
|
|
(Handled_Statement_Sequence (Acc_Stat)));
|
|
|
|
Goto_Stat := Make_Goto_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Occurrence_Of
|
|
(Entity (Identifier (Lab_Node)), Loc));
|
|
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Goto_Stat);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Goto_Stat);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a return from an entry body, put a Complete_Entry_Body
|
|
-- call in front of the return.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Protected_Type (Scope_Id) then
|
|
|
|
Call :=
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Complete_Entry_Body), Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => New_List
|
|
(Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(Object_Ref
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Parent (Scope_Id))),
|
|
Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Unchecked_Access)));
|
|
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Call);
|
|
Analyze (Call);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
T := Etype (Exp);
|
|
Return_Type := Etype (Scope_Id);
|
|
Utyp := Underlying_Type (Return_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Check the result expression of a scalar function against the subtype
|
|
-- of the function by inserting a conversion. This conversion must
|
|
-- eventually be performed for other classes of types, but for now it's
|
|
-- only done for scalars. ???
|
|
|
|
if Is_Scalar_Type (T) then
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Convert_To (Return_Type, Exp));
|
|
Analyze (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with returning variable length objects and controlled types
|
|
|
|
-- Nothing to do if we are returning by reference, or this is not a
|
|
-- type that requires special processing (indicated by the fact that
|
|
-- it requires a cleanup scope for the secondary stack case).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Inherently_Limited_Type (T) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Requires_Transient_Scope (Return_Type) then
|
|
|
|
-- Mutable records with no variable length components are not
|
|
-- returned on the sec-stack, so we need to make sure that the
|
|
-- backend will only copy back the size of the actual value, and not
|
|
-- the maximum size. We create an actual subtype for this purpose.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Ubt : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Base_Type (T));
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Ubt)
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Ubt)
|
|
and then not Has_Unchecked_Union (Ubt)
|
|
then
|
|
Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype (Ubt, Exp);
|
|
Ent := Defining_Identifier (Decl);
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp, Decl);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Unchecked_Convert_To (Ent, Exp));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of secondary stack not used
|
|
|
|
elsif Function_Returns_With_DSP (Scope_Id) then
|
|
|
|
-- The DSP method is no longer in use. We would like to ignore DSP
|
|
-- while implementing AI-318; hence the raise below.
|
|
|
|
if True then
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Here what we need to do is to always return by reference, since
|
|
-- we will return with the stack pointer depressed. We may need to
|
|
-- do a copy to a local temporary before doing this return.
|
|
|
|
No_Secondary_Stack_Case : declare
|
|
Local_Copy_Required : Boolean := False;
|
|
-- Set to True if a local copy is required
|
|
|
|
Copy_Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Used for the target entity if a copy is required
|
|
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
-- Declaration used to create copy if needed
|
|
|
|
procedure Test_Copy_Required (Expr : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Determines if Expr represents a return value for which a
|
|
-- copy is required. More specifically, a copy is not required
|
|
-- if Expr represents an object or component of an object that
|
|
-- is either in the local subprogram frame, or is constant.
|
|
-- If a copy is required, then Local_Copy_Required is set True.
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Test_Copy_Required --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Test_Copy_Required (Expr : Node_Id) is
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If component, test prefix (object containing component)
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Expr) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Expr) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
then
|
|
Test_Copy_Required (Prefix (Expr));
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- See if we have an entity name
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (Expr) then
|
|
Ent := Entity (Expr);
|
|
|
|
-- Constant entity is always OK, no copy required
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Ent) = E_Constant then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- No copy required for local variable
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Ent) = E_Variable
|
|
and then Scope (Ent) = Current_Subprogram
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- All other cases require a copy
|
|
|
|
Local_Copy_Required := True;
|
|
end Test_Copy_Required;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for No_Secondary_Stack_Case
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- No copy needed if result is from a function call.
|
|
-- In this case the result is already being returned by
|
|
-- reference with the stack pointer depressed.
|
|
|
|
-- To make up for a gcc 2.8.1 deficiency (???), we perform
|
|
-- the copy for array types if the constrained status of the
|
|
-- target type is different from that of the expression.
|
|
|
|
if Requires_Transient_Scope (T)
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Array_Type (T)
|
|
or else Is_Constrained (T) = Is_Constrained (Return_Type)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (T))
|
|
and then Nkind (Exp) = N_Function_Call
|
|
then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- We always need a local copy for a controlled type, since
|
|
-- we are required to finalize the local value before return.
|
|
-- The copy will automatically include the required finalize.
|
|
-- Moreover, gigi cannot make this copy, since we need special
|
|
-- processing to ensure proper behavior for finalization.
|
|
|
|
-- Note: the reason we are returning with a depressed stack
|
|
-- pointer in the controlled case (even if the type involved
|
|
-- is constrained) is that we must make a local copy to deal
|
|
-- properly with the requirement that the local result be
|
|
-- finalized.
|
|
|
|
elsif Controlled_Type (Utyp) then
|
|
Copy_Ent :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
|
|
-- Build declaration to do the copy, and insert it, setting
|
|
-- Assignment_OK, because we may be copying a limited type.
|
|
-- In addition we set the special flag to inhibit finalize
|
|
-- attachment if this is a controlled type (since this attach
|
|
-- must be done by the caller, otherwise if we attach it here
|
|
-- we will finalize the returned result prematurely).
|
|
|
|
Decl :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Copy_Ent,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (Return_Type, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp));
|
|
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Decl);
|
|
Set_Delay_Finalize_Attach (Decl);
|
|
Insert_Action (N, Decl);
|
|
|
|
-- Now the actual return uses the copied value
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, New_Occurrence_Of (Copy_Ent, Loc));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, Return_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Since we have made the copy, gigi does not have to, so
|
|
-- we set the By_Ref flag to prevent another copy being made.
|
|
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Non-controlled cases
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Test_Copy_Required (Exp);
|
|
|
|
-- If a local copy is required, then gigi will make the
|
|
-- copy, otherwise, we can return the result directly,
|
|
-- so set By_Ref to suppress the gigi copy.
|
|
|
|
if not Local_Copy_Required then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end No_Secondary_Stack_Case;
|
|
|
|
-- Here if secondary stack is used
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Make sure that no surrounding block will reclaim the secondary
|
|
-- stack on which we are going to put the result. Not only may this
|
|
-- introduce secondary stack leaks but worse, if the reclamation is
|
|
-- done too early, then the result we are returning may get
|
|
-- clobbered. See example in 7417-003.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
S : Entity_Id := Current_Scope;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Ekind (S) = E_Block or else Ekind (S) = E_Loop loop
|
|
Set_Sec_Stack_Needed_For_Return (S, True);
|
|
S := Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (S);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Optimize the case where the result is a function call. In this
|
|
-- case either the result is already on the secondary stack, or is
|
|
-- already being returned with the stack pointer depressed and no
|
|
-- further processing is required except to set the By_Ref flag to
|
|
-- ensure that gigi does not attempt an extra unnecessary copy.
|
|
-- (actually not just unnecessary but harmfully wrong in the case
|
|
-- of a controlled type, where gigi does not know how to do a copy).
|
|
-- To make up for a gcc 2.8.1 deficiency (???), we perform
|
|
-- the copy for array types if the constrained status of the
|
|
-- target type is different from that of the expression.
|
|
|
|
if Requires_Transient_Scope (T)
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Array_Type (T)
|
|
or else Is_Constrained (T) = Is_Constrained (Return_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (T))
|
|
and then Nkind (Exp) = N_Function_Call
|
|
then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Remove side effects from the expression now so that
|
|
-- other part of the expander do not have to reanalyze
|
|
-- this node without this optimization
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (Exp));
|
|
|
|
-- For controlled types, do the allocation on the secondary stack
|
|
-- manually in order to call adjust at the right time:
|
|
-- type Anon1 is access Return_Type;
|
|
-- for Anon1'Storage_pool use ss_pool;
|
|
-- Anon2 : anon1 := new Return_Type'(expr);
|
|
-- return Anon2.all;
|
|
-- We do the same for classwide types that are not potentially
|
|
-- controlled (by the virtue of restriction No_Finalization) because
|
|
-- gigi is not able to properly allocate class-wide types.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (Utyp)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Temp : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
Acc_Typ : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('A'));
|
|
Alloc_Node : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Ekind (Acc_Typ, E_Access_Type);
|
|
|
|
Set_Associated_Storage_Pool (Acc_Typ, RTE (RE_SS_Pool));
|
|
|
|
Alloc_Node :=
|
|
Make_Allocator (Loc,
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Qualified_Expression (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Mark => New_Reference_To (Etype (Exp), Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp)));
|
|
|
|
Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (N, New_List (
|
|
Make_Full_Type_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Acc_Typ,
|
|
Type_Definition =>
|
|
Make_Access_To_Object_Definition (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Indication =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (Return_Type, Loc))),
|
|
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Temp,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Reference_To (Acc_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Alloc_Node)));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp,
|
|
Make_Explicit_Dereference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Reference_To (Temp, Loc)));
|
|
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, Return_Type);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise use the gigi mechanism to allocate result on the
|
|
-- secondary stack.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Storage_Pool (N, RTE (RE_SS_Pool));
|
|
|
|
-- If we are generating code for the Java VM do not use
|
|
-- SS_Allocate since everything is heap-allocated anyway.
|
|
|
|
if not Java_VM then
|
|
Set_Procedure_To_Call (N, RTE (RE_SS_Allocate));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Implement the rules of 6.5(8-10), which require a tag check in
|
|
-- the case of a limited tagged return type, and tag reassignment
|
|
-- for nonlimited tagged results. These actions are needed when
|
|
-- the return type is a specific tagged type and the result
|
|
-- expression is a conversion or a formal parameter, because in
|
|
-- that case the tag of the expression might differ from the tag
|
|
-- of the specific result type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (Utyp)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
and then (Nkind (Exp) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else (Is_Entity_Name (Exp)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Exp)) in Formal_Kind))
|
|
then
|
|
-- When the return type is limited, perform a check that the
|
|
-- tag of the result is the same as the tag of the return type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Limited_Type (Return_Type) then
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp,
|
|
Make_Raise_Constraint_Error (Loc,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Ne (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Exp),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (First_Tag_Component (Utyp), Loc)),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (RTE (RE_Tag),
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(Node (First_Elmt
|
|
(Access_Disp_Table (Base_Type (Utyp)))),
|
|
Loc))),
|
|
Reason => CE_Tag_Check_Failed));
|
|
|
|
-- If the result type is a specific nonlimited tagged type,
|
|
-- then we have to ensure that the tag of the result is that
|
|
-- of the result type. This is handled by making a copy of the
|
|
-- expression in the case where it might have a different tag,
|
|
-- namely when the expression is a conversion or a formal
|
|
-- parameter. We create a new object of the result type and
|
|
-- initialize it from the expression, which will implicitly
|
|
-- force the tag to be set appropriately.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Result_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc, New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
Result_Exp := New_Reference_To (Result_Id, Loc);
|
|
|
|
Result_Obj :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Result_Id,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Reference_To (Return_Type, Loc),
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp));
|
|
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Result_Obj);
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp, Result_Obj);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Result_Exp);
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, Return_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-344): If the result type is class-wide, then insert
|
|
-- a check that the level of the return expression's underlying type
|
|
-- is not deeper than the level of the master enclosing the function.
|
|
-- Always generate the check when the type of the return expression
|
|
-- is class-wide, when it's a type conversion, or when it's a formal
|
|
-- parameter. Otherwise, suppress the check in the case where the
|
|
-- return expression has a specific type whose level is known not to
|
|
-- be statically deeper than the function's result type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (Return_Type)
|
|
and then not Scope_Suppress (Accessibility_Check)
|
|
and then
|
|
(Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Exp))
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else (Is_Entity_Name (Exp)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Exp)) in Formal_Kind)
|
|
or else Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Etype (Exp))) >
|
|
Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Scope_Id)))
|
|
then
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp,
|
|
Make_Raise_Program_Error (Loc,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Gt (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
|
|
Name =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Get_Access_Level), Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations =>
|
|
New_List (Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Exp),
|
|
Attribute_Name =>
|
|
Name_Tag))),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Scope_Id)))),
|
|
Reason => PE_Accessibility_Check_Failed));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
exception
|
|
when RE_Not_Available =>
|
|
return;
|
|
end Expand_N_Return_Statement;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Non_Function_Return --
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Non_Function_Return (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
pragma Assert (No (Expression (N)));
|
|
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Scope_Id : Entity_Id :=
|
|
Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N));
|
|
Kind : constant Entity_Kind := Ekind (Scope_Id);
|
|
Call : Node_Id;
|
|
Acc_Stat : Node_Id;
|
|
Goto_Stat : Node_Id;
|
|
Lab_Node : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If it is a return from procedures do no extra steps
|
|
|
|
if Kind = E_Procedure or else Kind = E_Generic_Procedure then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a nested return within an extended one, replace it
|
|
-- with a return of the previously declared return object.
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = E_Return_Statement then
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Return_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (First_Entity (Scope_Id), Loc)));
|
|
Set_Comes_From_Extended_Return_Statement (N);
|
|
Set_Return_Statement_Entity (N, Scope_Id);
|
|
Expand_Simple_Function_Return (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Entry (Scope_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- Look at the enclosing block to see whether the return is from
|
|
-- an accept statement or an entry body.
|
|
|
|
for J in reverse 0 .. Scope_Stack.Last loop
|
|
Scope_Id := Scope_Stack.Table (J).Entity;
|
|
exit when Is_Concurrent_Type (Scope_Id);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a return from accept statement it is expanded as call to
|
|
-- RTS Complete_Rendezvous and a goto to the end of the accept body.
|
|
|
|
-- (cf : Expand_N_Accept_Statement, Expand_N_Selective_Accept,
|
|
-- Expand_N_Accept_Alternative in exp_ch9.adb)
|
|
|
|
if Is_Task_Type (Scope_Id) then
|
|
|
|
Call :=
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Complete_Rendezvous), Loc));
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Call);
|
|
-- why not insert actions here???
|
|
Analyze (Call);
|
|
|
|
Acc_Stat := Parent (N);
|
|
while Nkind (Acc_Stat) /= N_Accept_Statement loop
|
|
Acc_Stat := Parent (Acc_Stat);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Lab_Node := Last (Statements
|
|
(Handled_Statement_Sequence (Acc_Stat)));
|
|
|
|
Goto_Stat := Make_Goto_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Occurrence_Of
|
|
(Entity (Identifier (Lab_Node)), Loc));
|
|
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Goto_Stat);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Goto_Stat);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- If it is a return from an entry body, put a Complete_Entry_Body
|
|
-- call in front of the return.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Protected_Type (Scope_Id) then
|
|
Call :=
|
|
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Complete_Entry_Body), Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations => New_List
|
|
(Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(Object_Ref
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Parent (Scope_Id))),
|
|
Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Unchecked_Access)));
|
|
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Call);
|
|
Analyze (Call);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Expand_Non_Function_Return;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Simple_Return --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Simple_Return (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Distinguish the function and non-function cases:
|
|
|
|
case Ekind (Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N))) is
|
|
|
|
when E_Function |
|
|
E_Generic_Function =>
|
|
Expand_Simple_Function_Return (N);
|
|
|
|
when E_Procedure |
|
|
E_Generic_Procedure |
|
|
E_Entry |
|
|
E_Entry_Family |
|
|
E_Return_Statement =>
|
|
Expand_Non_Function_Return (N);
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
|
end case;
|
|
|
|
exception
|
|
when RE_Not_Available =>
|
|
return;
|
|
end Expand_Simple_Return;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Expand_Simple_Function_Return --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- The "simple" comes from the syntax rule simple_return_statement.
|
|
-- The semantics are not at all simple!
|
|
|
|
procedure Expand_Simple_Function_Return (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
|
|
Scope_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N));
|
|
-- The function we are returning from
|
|
|
|
R_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Scope_Id);
|
|
-- The result type of the function
|
|
|
|
Utyp : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (R_Type);
|
|
|
|
Exp : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
pragma Assert (Present (Exp));
|
|
|
|
Exptyp : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Exp);
|
|
-- The type of the expression (not necessarily the same as R_Type)
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- The DSP method is no longer in use
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (not Function_Returns_With_DSP (Scope_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- We rewrite "return <expression>;" to be:
|
|
|
|
-- return _anon_ : <return_subtype> := <expression>
|
|
|
|
-- The expansion produced by Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement will
|
|
-- contain simple return statements (for example, a block containing a
|
|
-- simple return of the return object), which brings us back here with
|
|
-- Comes_From_Extended_Return_Statement set. To avoid infinite
|
|
-- recursion, we do not transform into an extended return if
|
|
-- Comes_From_Extended_Return_Statement is True.
|
|
|
|
-- The reason for this design is that for Ada 2005 limited returns, we
|
|
-- need to reify the return object, so we can build it "in place",
|
|
-- and we need a block statement to hang finalization and tasking stuff
|
|
-- off of.
|
|
|
|
-- ??? In order to avoid disruption, we avoid translating to extended
|
|
-- return except in the cases where we really need to (Ada 2005
|
|
-- inherently limited). We would prefer eventually to do this
|
|
-- translation in all cases except perhaps for the case of Ada 95
|
|
-- inherently limited, in order to fully exercise the code in
|
|
-- Expand_N_Extended_Return_Statement, and in order to do
|
|
-- build-in-place for efficiency when it is not required.
|
|
|
|
if not Comes_From_Extended_Return_Statement (N)
|
|
and then Is_Inherently_Limited_Type (R_Type) -- ???
|
|
and then Ada_Version >= Ada_05 -- ???
|
|
and then not Debug_Flag_Dot_L
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Return_Object_Entity : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
|
|
Subtype_Ind : constant Node_Id := New_Occurrence_Of (R_Type, Loc);
|
|
|
|
Obj_Decl : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Return_Object_Entity,
|
|
Object_Definition => Subtype_Ind,
|
|
Expression => Exp);
|
|
|
|
Ext : constant Node_Id := Make_Extended_Return_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Return_Object_Declarations => New_List (Obj_Decl));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Rewrite (N, Ext);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Here we have a simple return statement that is part of the expansion
|
|
-- of an extended return statement (either written by the user, or
|
|
-- generated by the above code).
|
|
|
|
-- Always normalize C/Fortran boolean result. This is not always
|
|
-- necessary, but it seems a good idea to minimize the passing
|
|
-- around of non-normalized values, and in any case this handles
|
|
-- the processing of barrier functions for protected types, which
|
|
-- turn the condition into a return statement.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Boolean_Type (Exptyp)
|
|
and then Nonzero_Is_True (Exptyp)
|
|
then
|
|
Adjust_Condition (Exp);
|
|
Adjust_Result_Type (Exp, Exptyp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Do validity check if enabled for returns
|
|
|
|
if Validity_Checks_On
|
|
and then Validity_Check_Returns
|
|
then
|
|
Ensure_Valid (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check the result expression of a scalar function against the subtype
|
|
-- of the function by inserting a conversion. This conversion must
|
|
-- eventually be performed for other classes of types, but for now it's
|
|
-- only done for scalars.
|
|
-- ???
|
|
|
|
if Is_Scalar_Type (Exptyp) then
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Convert_To (R_Type, Exp));
|
|
Analyze (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with returning variable length objects and controlled types
|
|
|
|
-- Nothing to do if we are returning by reference, or this is not a
|
|
-- type that requires special processing (indicated by the fact that
|
|
-- it requires a cleanup scope for the secondary stack case).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Inherently_Limited_Type (Exptyp) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Requires_Transient_Scope (R_Type) then
|
|
|
|
-- Mutable records with no variable length components are not
|
|
-- returned on the sec-stack, so we need to make sure that the
|
|
-- backend will only copy back the size of the actual value, and not
|
|
-- the maximum size. We create an actual subtype for this purpose.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Ubt : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Base_Type (Exptyp));
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
begin
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Ubt)
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Ubt)
|
|
and then not Has_Unchecked_Union (Ubt)
|
|
then
|
|
Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype (Ubt, Exp);
|
|
Ent := Defining_Identifier (Decl);
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp, Decl);
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Unchecked_Convert_To (Ent, Exp));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of secondary stack not used
|
|
|
|
elsif Function_Returns_With_DSP (Scope_Id) then
|
|
|
|
-- The DSP method is no longer in use. We would like to ignore DSP
|
|
-- while implementing AI-318; hence the following assertion. Keep the
|
|
-- old code around in case DSP is revived someday.
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (False);
|
|
|
|
No_Secondary_Stack_Case (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Here if secondary stack is used
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Make sure that no surrounding block will reclaim the secondary
|
|
-- stack on which we are going to put the result. Not only may this
|
|
-- introduce secondary stack leaks but worse, if the reclamation is
|
|
-- done too early, then the result we are returning may get
|
|
-- clobbered. See example in 7417-003.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
S : Entity_Id;
|
|
begin
|
|
S := Current_Scope;
|
|
while Ekind (S) = E_Block or else Ekind (S) = E_Loop loop
|
|
Set_Sec_Stack_Needed_For_Return (S, True);
|
|
S := Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (S);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Optimize the case where the result is a function call. In this
|
|
-- case either the result is already on the secondary stack, or is
|
|
-- already being returned with the stack pointer depressed and no
|
|
-- further processing is required except to set the By_Ref flag to
|
|
-- ensure that gigi does not attempt an extra unnecessary copy.
|
|
-- (actually not just unnecessary but harmfully wrong in the case
|
|
-- of a controlled type, where gigi does not know how to do a copy).
|
|
-- To make up for a gcc 2.8.1 deficiency (???), we perform
|
|
-- the copy for array types if the constrained status of the
|
|
-- target type is different from that of the expression.
|
|
|
|
if Requires_Transient_Scope (Exptyp)
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Array_Type (Exptyp)
|
|
or else Is_Constrained (Exptyp) = Is_Constrained (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (Exptyp))
|
|
and then Nkind (Exp) = N_Function_Call
|
|
then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Remove side effects from the expression now so that
|
|
-- other part of the expander do not have to reanalyze
|
|
-- this node without this optimization
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (Exp));
|
|
|
|
-- For controlled types, do the allocation on the secondary stack
|
|
-- manually in order to call adjust at the right time:
|
|
|
|
-- type Anon1 is access R_Type;
|
|
-- for Anon1'Storage_pool use ss_pool;
|
|
-- Anon2 : anon1 := new R_Type'(expr);
|
|
-- return Anon2.all;
|
|
|
|
-- We do the same for classwide types that are not potentially
|
|
-- controlled (by the virtue of restriction No_Finalization) because
|
|
-- gigi is not able to properly allocate class-wide types.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (Utyp)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Temp : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
Acc_Typ : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('A'));
|
|
Alloc_Node : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Ekind (Acc_Typ, E_Access_Type);
|
|
|
|
Set_Associated_Storage_Pool (Acc_Typ, RTE (RE_SS_Pool));
|
|
|
|
Alloc_Node :=
|
|
Make_Allocator (Loc,
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Qualified_Expression (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Mark => New_Reference_To (Etype (Exp), Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp)));
|
|
|
|
Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (N, New_List (
|
|
Make_Full_Type_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Acc_Typ,
|
|
Type_Definition =>
|
|
Make_Access_To_Object_Definition (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Indication =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (R_Type, Loc))),
|
|
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Temp,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Reference_To (Acc_Typ, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Alloc_Node)));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp,
|
|
Make_Explicit_Dereference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Reference_To (Temp, Loc)));
|
|
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, R_Type);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise use the gigi mechanism to allocate result on the
|
|
-- secondary stack.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Storage_Pool (N, RTE (RE_SS_Pool));
|
|
|
|
-- If we are generating code for the Java VM do not use
|
|
-- SS_Allocate since everything is heap-allocated anyway.
|
|
|
|
if not Java_VM then
|
|
Set_Procedure_To_Call (N, RTE (RE_SS_Allocate));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Implement the rules of 6.5(8-10), which require a tag check in
|
|
-- the case of a limited tagged return type, and tag reassignment
|
|
-- for nonlimited tagged results. These actions are needed when
|
|
-- the return type is a specific tagged type and the result
|
|
-- expression is a conversion or a formal parameter, because in
|
|
-- that case the tag of the expression might differ from the tag
|
|
-- of the specific result type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (Utyp)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Utyp)
|
|
and then (Nkind (Exp) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else (Is_Entity_Name (Exp)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Exp)) in Formal_Kind))
|
|
then
|
|
-- When the return type is limited, perform a check that the
|
|
-- tag of the result is the same as the tag of the return type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Limited_Type (R_Type) then
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp,
|
|
Make_Raise_Constraint_Error (Loc,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Ne (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr (Exp),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (First_Tag_Component (Utyp), Loc)),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (RTE (RE_Tag),
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(Node (First_Elmt
|
|
(Access_Disp_Table (Base_Type (Utyp)))),
|
|
Loc))),
|
|
Reason => CE_Tag_Check_Failed));
|
|
|
|
-- If the result type is a specific nonlimited tagged type,
|
|
-- then we have to ensure that the tag of the result is that
|
|
-- of the result type. This is handled by making a copy of the
|
|
-- expression in the case where it might have a different tag,
|
|
-- namely when the expression is a conversion or a formal
|
|
-- parameter. We create a new object of the result type and
|
|
-- initialize it from the expression, which will implicitly
|
|
-- force the tag to be set appropriately.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
Result_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
Result_Exp : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
New_Reference_To (Result_Id, Loc);
|
|
Result_Obj : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Result_Id,
|
|
Object_Definition =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (R_Type, Loc),
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Result_Obj);
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp, Result_Obj);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, Result_Exp);
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, R_Type);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-344): If the result type is class-wide, then insert
|
|
-- a check that the level of the return expression's underlying type
|
|
-- is not deeper than the level of the master enclosing the function.
|
|
-- Always generate the check when the type of the return expression
|
|
-- is class-wide, when it's a type conversion, or when it's a formal
|
|
-- parameter. Otherwise, suppress the check in the case where the
|
|
-- return expression has a specific type whose level is known not to
|
|
-- be statically deeper than the function's result type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then not Scope_Suppress (Accessibility_Check)
|
|
and then
|
|
(Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Exp))
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else Nkind (Exp) = N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion
|
|
or else (Is_Entity_Name (Exp)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Exp)) in Formal_Kind)
|
|
or else Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Etype (Exp))) >
|
|
Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Scope_Id)))
|
|
then
|
|
Insert_Action (Exp,
|
|
Make_Raise_Program_Error (Loc,
|
|
Condition =>
|
|
Make_Op_Gt (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
|
|
Name =>
|
|
New_Reference_To
|
|
(RTE (RE_Get_Access_Level), Loc),
|
|
Parameter_Associations =>
|
|
New_List (Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Duplicate_Subexpr (Exp),
|
|
Attribute_Name =>
|
|
Name_Tag))),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
Scope_Depth (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Scope_Id)))),
|
|
Reason => PE_Accessibility_Check_Failed));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Expand_Simple_Function_Return;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Make_Tag_Ctrl_Assignment --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Make_Tag_Ctrl_Assignment (N : Node_Id) return List_Id is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
L : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
T : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Etype (L));
|
|
|
|
Ctrl_Act : constant Boolean := Controlled_Type (T)
|
|
and then not No_Ctrl_Actions (N);
|
|
|
|
Save_Tag : constant Boolean := Is_Tagged_Type (T)
|
|
and then not No_Ctrl_Actions (N)
|
|
and then not Java_VM;
|
|
-- Tags are not saved and restored when Java_VM because JVM tags
|
|
-- are represented implicitly in objects.
|
|
|
|
Res : List_Id;
|
|
Tag_Tmp : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Res := New_List;
|
|
|
|
-- Finalize the target of the assignment when controlled.
|
|
-- We have two exceptions here:
|
|
|
|
-- 1. If we are in an init proc since it is an initialization
|
|
-- more than an assignment
|
|
|
|
-- 2. If the left-hand side is a temporary that was not initialized
|
|
-- (or the parent part of a temporary since it is the case in
|
|
-- extension aggregates). Such a temporary does not come from
|
|
-- source. We must examine the original node for the prefix, because
|
|
-- it may be a component of an entry formal, in which case it has
|
|
-- been rewritten and does not appear to come from source either.
|
|
|
|
-- Case of init proc
|
|
|
|
if not Ctrl_Act then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- The left hand side is an uninitialized temporary
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (L) = N_Type_Conversion
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (Expression (L))
|
|
and then No_Initialization (Parent (Entity (Expression (L))))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
else
|
|
Append_List_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Final_Call (
|
|
Ref => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Typ => Etype (L),
|
|
With_Detach => New_Reference_To (Standard_False, Loc)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Save the Tag in a local variable Tag_Tmp
|
|
|
|
if Save_Tag then
|
|
Tag_Tmp :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc, New_Internal_Name ('A'));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Tag_Tmp,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Tag), Loc),
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Selector_Name => New_Reference_To (First_Tag_Component (T),
|
|
Loc))));
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise Tag_Tmp not used
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Tag_Tmp := Empty;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Processing for controlled types and types with controlled components
|
|
|
|
-- Variables of such types contain pointers used to chain them in
|
|
-- finalization lists, in addition to user data. These pointers are
|
|
-- specific to each object of the type, not to the value being assigned.
|
|
-- Thus they need to be left intact during the assignment. We achieve
|
|
-- this by constructing a Storage_Array subtype, and by overlaying
|
|
-- objects of this type on the source and target of the assignment.
|
|
-- The assignment is then rewritten to assignments of slices of these
|
|
-- arrays, copying the user data, and leaving the pointers untouched.
|
|
|
|
if Ctrl_Act then
|
|
Controlled_Actions : declare
|
|
Prev_Ref : Node_Id;
|
|
-- A reference to the Prev component of the record controller
|
|
|
|
First_After_Root : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Index of first byte to be copied (used to skip
|
|
-- Root_Controlled in controlled objects).
|
|
|
|
Last_Before_Hole : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Index of last byte to be copied before outermost record
|
|
-- controller data.
|
|
|
|
Hole_Length : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Length of record controller data (Prev and Next pointers)
|
|
|
|
First_After_Hole : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Index of first byte to be copied after outermost record
|
|
-- controller data.
|
|
|
|
Expr, Source_Size : Node_Id;
|
|
Source_Actual_Subtype : Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Used for computation of the size of the data to be copied
|
|
|
|
Range_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Opaque_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Build_Slice
|
|
(Rec : Entity_Id;
|
|
Lo : Node_Id;
|
|
Hi : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
|
|
-- Build and return a slice of an array of type S overlaid
|
|
-- on object Rec, with bounds specified by Lo and Hi. If either
|
|
-- bound is empty, a default of S'First (respectively S'Last)
|
|
-- is used.
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
-- Build_Slice --
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
function Build_Slice
|
|
(Rec : Node_Id;
|
|
Lo : Node_Id;
|
|
Hi : Node_Id) return Node_Id
|
|
is
|
|
Lo_Bound : Node_Id;
|
|
Hi_Bound : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Opaque : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Unchecked_Convert_To (Opaque_Type,
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Rec,
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Address));
|
|
-- Access value designating an opaque storage array of
|
|
-- type S overlaid on record Rec.
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Compute slice bounds using S'First (1) and S'Last
|
|
-- as default values when not specified by the caller.
|
|
|
|
if No (Lo) then
|
|
Lo_Bound := Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, 1);
|
|
else
|
|
Lo_Bound := Lo;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if No (Hi) then
|
|
Hi_Bound := Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Occurrence_Of (Range_Type, Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Last);
|
|
else
|
|
Hi_Bound := Hi;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Make_Slice (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Opaque,
|
|
Discrete_Range => Make_Range (Loc,
|
|
Lo_Bound, Hi_Bound));
|
|
end Build_Slice;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Controlled_Actions
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Create a constrained subtype of Storage_Array whose size
|
|
-- corresponds to the value being assigned.
|
|
|
|
-- subtype G is Storage_Offset range
|
|
-- 1 .. (Expr'Size + Storage_Unit - 1) / Storage_Unit
|
|
|
|
Expr := Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (Expression (N));
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Expr) = N_Qualified_Expression then
|
|
Expr := Expression (Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Source_Actual_Subtype := Etype (Expr);
|
|
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Source_Actual_Subtype)
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Source_Actual_Subtype)
|
|
then
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Build_Actual_Subtype (Source_Actual_Subtype, Expr));
|
|
Source_Actual_Subtype := Defining_Identifier (Last (Res));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Source_Size :=
|
|
Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Source_Actual_Subtype, Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name =>
|
|
Name_Size),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
System_Storage_Unit - 1));
|
|
Source_Size :=
|
|
Make_Op_Divide (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd => Source_Size,
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
Intval => System_Storage_Unit));
|
|
|
|
Range_Type :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
New_Internal_Name ('G'));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Subtype_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Range_Type,
|
|
Subtype_Indication =>
|
|
Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Mark =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Storage_Offset), Loc),
|
|
Constraint => Make_Range_Constraint (Loc,
|
|
Range_Expression =>
|
|
Make_Range (Loc,
|
|
Low_Bound => Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, 1),
|
|
High_Bound => Source_Size)))));
|
|
|
|
-- subtype S is Storage_Array (G)
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Subtype_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier =>
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
New_Internal_Name ('S')),
|
|
Subtype_Indication =>
|
|
Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Mark =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Storage_Array), Loc),
|
|
Constraint =>
|
|
Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (Loc,
|
|
Constraints =>
|
|
New_List (New_Reference_To (Range_Type, Loc))))));
|
|
|
|
-- type A is access S
|
|
|
|
Opaque_Type :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('A'));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Full_Type_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Opaque_Type,
|
|
Type_Definition =>
|
|
Make_Access_To_Object_Definition (Loc,
|
|
Subtype_Indication =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (
|
|
Defining_Identifier (Last (Res)), Loc))));
|
|
|
|
-- Generate appropriate slice assignments
|
|
|
|
First_After_Root := Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, 1);
|
|
|
|
-- For the case of a controlled object, skip the
|
|
-- Root_Controlled part.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Controlled (T) then
|
|
First_After_Root :=
|
|
Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
First_After_Root,
|
|
Make_Op_Divide (Loc,
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (RTE (RE_Root_Controlled), Loc),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Size),
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, System_Storage_Unit)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For the case of a record with controlled components, skip
|
|
-- the Prev and Next components of the record controller.
|
|
-- These components constitute a 'hole' in the middle of the
|
|
-- data to be copied.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Controlled_Component (T) then
|
|
Prev_Ref :=
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Selector_Name =>
|
|
New_Reference_To (Controller_Component (T), Loc)),
|
|
Selector_Name => Make_Identifier (Loc, Name_Prev));
|
|
|
|
-- Last index before hole: determined by position of
|
|
-- the _Controller.Prev component.
|
|
|
|
Last_Before_Hole :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
New_Internal_Name ('L'));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Last_Before_Hole,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (
|
|
RTE (RE_Storage_Offset), Loc),
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Expression => Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Prev_Ref,
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Position),
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Copy_Tree (Prefix (Prev_Ref)),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Position))));
|
|
|
|
-- Hole length: size of the Prev and Next components
|
|
|
|
Hole_Length :=
|
|
Make_Op_Multiply (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd => Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Uint_2),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Op_Divide (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Copy_Tree (Prev_Ref),
|
|
Attribute_Name => Name_Size),
|
|
Right_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Integer_Literal (Loc,
|
|
Intval => System_Storage_Unit)));
|
|
|
|
-- First index after hole
|
|
|
|
First_After_Hole :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
New_Internal_Name ('F'));
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => First_After_Hole,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (
|
|
RTE (RE_Storage_Offset), Loc),
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
Make_Op_Add (Loc,
|
|
Left_Opnd =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Last_Before_Hole, Loc),
|
|
Right_Opnd => Hole_Length),
|
|
Right_Opnd => Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, 1))));
|
|
|
|
Last_Before_Hole := New_Occurrence_Of (Last_Before_Hole, Loc);
|
|
First_After_Hole := New_Occurrence_Of (First_After_Hole, Loc);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Assign the first slice (possibly skipping Root_Controlled,
|
|
-- up to the beginning of the record controller if present,
|
|
-- up to the end of the object if not).
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res, Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => Build_Slice (
|
|
Rec => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Lo => First_After_Root,
|
|
Hi => Last_Before_Hole),
|
|
|
|
Expression => Build_Slice (
|
|
Rec => Expression (N),
|
|
Lo => First_After_Root,
|
|
Hi => New_Copy_Tree (Last_Before_Hole))));
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_After_Hole) then
|
|
|
|
-- If a record controller is present, copy the second slice,
|
|
-- from right after the _Controller.Next component up to the
|
|
-- end of the object.
|
|
|
|
Append_To (Res, Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name => Build_Slice (
|
|
Rec => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Lo => First_After_Hole,
|
|
Hi => Empty),
|
|
Expression => Build_Slice (
|
|
Rec => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (Expression (N)),
|
|
Lo => New_Copy_Tree (First_After_Hole),
|
|
Hi => Empty)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Controlled_Actions;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Append_To (Res, Relocate_Node (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Restore the tag
|
|
|
|
if Save_Tag then
|
|
Append_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Assignment_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Name =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => Duplicate_Subexpr_No_Checks (L),
|
|
Selector_Name => New_Reference_To (First_Tag_Component (T),
|
|
Loc)),
|
|
Expression => New_Reference_To (Tag_Tmp, Loc)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Adjust the target after the assignment when controlled (not in the
|
|
-- init proc since it is an initialization more than an assignment).
|
|
|
|
if Ctrl_Act then
|
|
Append_List_To (Res,
|
|
Make_Adjust_Call (
|
|
Ref => Duplicate_Subexpr_Move_Checks (L),
|
|
Typ => Etype (L),
|
|
Flist_Ref => New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Global_Final_List), Loc),
|
|
With_Attach => Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, 0)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Res;
|
|
|
|
exception
|
|
-- Could use comment here ???
|
|
|
|
when RE_Not_Available =>
|
|
return Empty_List;
|
|
end Make_Tag_Ctrl_Assignment;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- No_Secondary_Stack_Case --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure No_Secondary_Stack_Case (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
pragma Assert (False); -- DSP method no longer in use
|
|
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Exp : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
T : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Exp);
|
|
Scope_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Return_Applies_To (Return_Statement_Entity (N));
|
|
Return_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Scope_Id);
|
|
Utyp : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Return_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Here what we need to do is to always return by reference, since
|
|
-- we will return with the stack pointer depressed. We may need to
|
|
-- do a copy to a local temporary before doing this return.
|
|
|
|
Local_Copy_Required : Boolean := False;
|
|
-- Set to True if a local copy is required
|
|
|
|
Copy_Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Used for the target entity if a copy is required
|
|
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
-- Declaration used to create copy if needed
|
|
|
|
procedure Test_Copy_Required (Expr : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Determines if Expr represents a return value for which a
|
|
-- copy is required. More specifically, a copy is not required
|
|
-- if Expr represents an object or component of an object that
|
|
-- is either in the local subprogram frame, or is constant.
|
|
-- If a copy is required, then Local_Copy_Required is set True.
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Test_Copy_Required --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Test_Copy_Required (Expr : Node_Id) is
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If component, test prefix (object containing component)
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Expr) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Expr) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
then
|
|
Test_Copy_Required (Prefix (Expr));
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- See if we have an entity name
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (Expr) then
|
|
Ent := Entity (Expr);
|
|
|
|
-- Constant entity is always OK, no copy required
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Ent) = E_Constant then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- No copy required for local variable
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Ent) = E_Variable
|
|
and then Scope (Ent) = Current_Subprogram
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- All other cases require a copy
|
|
|
|
Local_Copy_Required := True;
|
|
end Test_Copy_Required;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for No_Secondary_Stack_Case
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- No copy needed if result is from a function call.
|
|
-- In this case the result is already being returned by
|
|
-- reference with the stack pointer depressed.
|
|
|
|
-- To make up for a gcc 2.8.1 deficiency (???), we perform
|
|
-- the copy for array types if the constrained status of the
|
|
-- target type is different from that of the expression.
|
|
|
|
if Requires_Transient_Scope (T)
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Array_Type (T)
|
|
or else Is_Constrained (T) = Is_Constrained (Return_Type)
|
|
or else Controlled_Type (T))
|
|
and then Nkind (Exp) = N_Function_Call
|
|
then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- We always need a local copy for a controlled type, since
|
|
-- we are required to finalize the local value before return.
|
|
-- The copy will automatically include the required finalize.
|
|
-- Moreover, gigi cannot make this copy, since we need special
|
|
-- processing to ensure proper behavior for finalization.
|
|
|
|
-- Note: the reason we are returning with a depressed stack
|
|
-- pointer in the controlled case (even if the type involved
|
|
-- is constrained) is that we must make a local copy to deal
|
|
-- properly with the requirement that the local result be
|
|
-- finalized.
|
|
|
|
elsif Controlled_Type (Utyp) then
|
|
Copy_Ent :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
|
|
Chars => New_Internal_Name ('R'));
|
|
|
|
-- Build declaration to do the copy, and insert it, setting
|
|
-- Assignment_OK, because we may be copying a limited type.
|
|
-- In addition we set the special flag to inhibit finalize
|
|
-- attachment if this is a controlled type (since this attach
|
|
-- must be done by the caller, otherwise if we attach it here
|
|
-- we will finalize the returned result prematurely).
|
|
|
|
Decl :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => Copy_Ent,
|
|
Object_Definition => New_Occurrence_Of (Return_Type, Loc),
|
|
Expression => Relocate_Node (Exp));
|
|
|
|
Set_Assignment_OK (Decl);
|
|
Set_Delay_Finalize_Attach (Decl);
|
|
Insert_Action (N, Decl);
|
|
|
|
-- Now the actual return uses the copied value
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (Exp, New_Occurrence_Of (Copy_Ent, Loc));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, Return_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Since we have made the copy, gigi does not have to, so
|
|
-- we set the By_Ref flag to prevent another copy being made.
|
|
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Non-controlled cases
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Test_Copy_Required (Exp);
|
|
|
|
-- If a local copy is required, then gigi will make the
|
|
-- copy, otherwise, we can return the result directly,
|
|
-- so set By_Ref to suppress the gigi copy.
|
|
|
|
if not Local_Copy_Required then
|
|
Set_By_Ref (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end No_Secondary_Stack_Case;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
case Nkind (N) is
|
|
|
|
-- Case of indexed component
|
|
|
|
when N_Indexed_Component =>
|
|
declare
|
|
P : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
|
|
Ptyp : constant Entity_Id := Etype (P);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If we know the component size and it is less than 64, then
|
|
-- we are definitely OK. The back end always does assignment
|
|
-- of misaligned small objects correctly.
|
|
|
|
if Known_Static_Component_Size (Ptyp)
|
|
and then Component_Size (Ptyp) <= 64
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise, we need to test the prefix, to see if we are
|
|
-- indexing from a possibly unaligned component.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (P);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of selected component
|
|
|
|
when N_Selected_Component =>
|
|
declare
|
|
P : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
|
|
Comp : constant Entity_Id := Entity (Selector_Name (N));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If there is no component clause, then we are in the clear
|
|
-- since the back end will never misalign a large component
|
|
-- unless it is forced to do so. In the clear means we need
|
|
-- only the recursive test on the prefix.
|
|
|
|
if Component_May_Be_Bit_Aligned (Comp) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
else
|
|
return Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component (P);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- If we have neither a record nor array component, it means that
|
|
-- we have fallen off the top testing prefixes recursively, and
|
|
-- we now have a stand alone object, where we don't have a problem
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
end case;
|
|
end Possible_Bit_Aligned_Component;
|
|
|
|
end Exp_Ch5;
|