Add obvious fix rule
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc24370e47
commit
a9f1078629
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
|
2001-02-14 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* MAINTAINERS: Add "Obvious Fix" rule.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2001-02-11 Michael Sokolov <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
|
2001-02-11 Michael Sokolov <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* unwind-ia64.c: Don't use ANSI C preprocessor stringisation and string
|
* unwind-ia64.c: Don't use ANSI C preprocessor stringisation and string
|
||||||
|
@ -76,3 +76,14 @@ one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
|
|||||||
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
||||||
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just remember
|
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just remember
|
||||||
to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
|
||||||
|
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
|
||||||
|
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
|
||||||
|
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
|
||||||
|
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
|
||||||
|
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
||||||
|
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
||||||
|
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user